BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
PUNDALIK @ BANDU S/O DAULAT ZALAKE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. POLICE STATION OFFICER LAKHANI, TAH. LAKHANI, DIST. BHANDARA – Respondent
1/3
8 appa 165.21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
APPA NO.165 OF 2021
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2021
Pundalik @ Bandu S/o Daulat Zalake
Vs.
State of Maharashtra
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
Appearances, court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Shri Parag K.Bezalwal, Advocate for the applicant.
Shri N.S. Rao, APP for the non-applicant/State.
CORAM :Z. A. HAQ AND
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 04.03.2021.
1.
Shri N.S. Rao, learned APP for the State has
invited our attention to the order of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition Civil No.3/2020.
2.
In view of the order of Hon’ble Supreme Court,
there is no delay in filing present appeal, as the impugned
judgment is passed on 30th September 2020.
3.
In view of said reason, the application does not
survive. Application (APPA) is disposed of accordingly.
2/3
8 appa 165.21.odt
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO……../2021
1.
Heard.
2.
Admit.
3.
Shri N.S. Rao, learned APP waives notice for
the respondent/State.
4.
Call for Record and Proceedings.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. …….../2021
1.
By this application the accused has sought
suspension of sentence under Section 389 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure.
2.
We have carefully gone through the impugned
judgment and order and the notes of evidence placed on
record by the appellant. From the material placed on record,
it appears that the accused was 57 years old at the time of
incident and victim was 13 years old. During pendency of the
trial, the appellant was not on bail. Prima-facie, it appears
that there is evidence of prosecutrix (PW-1) which is
corroborated by the evidence of Mrs. Pallavi Gomase (PW-4)
and independent panch witness. In view of presumption
under Section 29 and 30 of the Protection of Children from
Sexual Offences Act, 2012, we are of the prima-facie opinion
that the appellant has not made out the case for suspension of
sentence and grant of bail. The application is therefore,
3/3
8 appa 165.21.odt
rejected.
3.
The appellant shall file private paper book
within eight weeks from today. The appeal shall be listed
for hearing after filing of the private paper book by the
appellant and after the record and proceedings are
received in this Court.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Manisha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.