SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
PANDURANG HARISHCHANDRA PARGAVE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PSO PS RAMTEK, NAGPUR – Respondent


Advocates:
['R H RAWLANI', '', 'ATUL R RAWLANI', 'APP']

B.A.316.2021.

1/6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Criminal Application (BA) No.316 of 2021

Pandurang Harishchandra Pargave

Vs.

State of Maharashtra through the P.S.O. Ramtek, Nagpur

******************************************************************************************************************

Office notes, Office Memoranda of

Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders

or directions and Registrar’s orders.

******************************************************************************************************************

Shri R.H. Rawlani, Advocate for the Applicant.

Shri M.A. Kadu, APP for the Non-applicant/State.

CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J.

RESERVED ON : 28

th APRIL, 2021.

PRONOUNCED ON : 5

th MAY, 2021.

Hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing and

the learned Counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was

proper.

02]

Heard learned Advocate Shri R.H. Rawlani for the

applicant and learned APP Shri M.A. Kadu for the non-applicant.

03]

This is one more instance wherein it can be said that all

the principles of morality have vanished. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top