SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
PANKAJ RAJU TADAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAH., THR. P.S.O. P.S. HINGANGHAT, DISTWARDHA – Respondent


76BA 314.2020

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 314 OF 2020

(Pankaj Raju Tadas, Wardha Vs. State of Maharashtra, thr. PSO Hinganghat, District

Wardha)

__________________________________________________________________________

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

appearances, Court'

s orders of directions

Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar'

s Orders.

Shri R.M. Daga, Advocate for the applicant.

Mrs. H.N. Prabhu, A.P.P. for the non-applicant.

CORAM : PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.

AUGUST 20, 2020.

Heard Shri Daga, learned counsel for the

applicant and Mrs. Prabhu, learned A.P.P. for the

non-applicant/State through Video Conferencing.

2.

The applicant is said to be arrested in

connection with Crime No. 597/2019 dated

09/09/2019 registered at Police Station, Hinganghat,

District Wardha for the offence punishable under

Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The prosecution case is that niece of the

informant i.e. the prosecutrix had a love affair with

the present applicant. The informant had given

understanding to the prosecutrix to not to indulge in

such things.

4.

On 07/09/2020, while the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top