SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
SANTABAI KISANRAO AREWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH SECRETARY OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


1

01.02 wp586 of 2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

WRIT PETITION NO.586 OF 2021

Santabai Kisanrao Arewar

… Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and others

… Respondents

Mr. V.N. Patre, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. Amit Madiwale, AGP for Respondent No.1.

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &

ANIL S. KILOR, JJ

DATE : 1 FEBRUARY 2021

P.C.:

The Petitioner has sought a direction to the Respondent-

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company to restore the

electricity connection which has been disconnected by the order

dated 20 November 2019. The impugned order states the

Petitioner had sought for new electricity connection, which was

refused on the ground that a Suit is pending before the Civil

Court.

2.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the

Petitioner’s brother, who has filed a Suit in respect of the property

in question, has objected to grant of electricity connection to the

Petitioner and which is one of the reasons why the application has

not been considered. The learned Counsel submits that under

Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003 even an occupier is

2

01.02 wp586 of 2021.odt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top