AJAY S/O RAMESHLAL METHANI AND 3 OTHERS vs STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS GADGE NAGAR AMRAVATI DIST.AMRAVATI AND ANOTHER

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
AJAY S/O RAMESHLAL METHANI AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS GADGE NAGAR AMRAVATI DIST.AMRAVATI AND ANOTHER – Respondent

Advocates:
['PANKAJ VASUDEV NAVLANI', '', 'CHIRAG NAVLANI', 'V L NAVLANI', 'V S UBERAI']

Judgment

apl588.21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 588/2021

Ajay S/o Rameshlal Methani

Ajay S/o Rameshlal Methani,

Aged 24 years, Occ. Business,

Vijay @ Viju S/o Rameshlal Methani

Vijay @ Viju S/o Rameshlal Methani,

Aged 35 years, Occ. Business,

Ravi S/o Anandrao Methani

Ravi S/o Anandrao Methani,

Aged 30 years, Occ. Business,

Pawan @ Vishal Lalchand Methani

Pawan @ Vishal Lalchand Methani,

Aged 24 years, Occ. M.R.,

All R/o. Rampuri Camp, Jhulelal Lane,

Amravati, Tq. & Dist. Amravati

….

APPLICANT(S)

VERSUS //

State of Maharashtra

State of Maharashtra,

Through P.S.O., P.S. Gadge Nagar,

Amravati, Dist. Amravati

Jaykumar Ramchandra Methani

Jaykumar Ramchandra Methani,

Aged 33 years, Occ. Business,

R/o. Rampuri Camp, Jhulelal Lane,

Amravati, Tq. & Dist. Amravati

….

…. NON-APPLICANT(S)

NON-APPLICANT(S)

*******************************************************************

Shri P.V. Navlani, Advocate for the applicant(s)

Shri S.S. Doifode, APP for the non-applicant no. 1

Shri V.S. Uberoi, Advocate for the non-applicant no. 2

*******************************************************************

CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE

& AMIT B. BORKAR

, JJ.

JULY 0

, 2021

Judgment

apl588.21.odt

JUDGMENT

: (PER:- AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)

Heard.

RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith.

This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure challenging registration of F.I.R. No. 1416/2021 dated

14/05/2021 registered with the non-applicant no. 1 - Police Station for the

offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian

Penal Code.

The first information report came to be registered against the

applicants with the accusations that in an altercation between the applicants

and the non-applicant no. 2, the applicant no. 2 assaulted the non-applicant

no. 2 with iron pipe with an intention to kill the non-applicant no. 2. It is

also alleged that the other applicants assaulted the non-applicant no. 2 with

blows and fists.

The applicants have therefore challenged registration of the first

information report by filing the present application. During the pendency of

the present application, the applicants and the non-applicant no. 2 have

mutually resolved their dispute. The non-applicant no. 2 has filed a

Judgment

apl588.21.odt

statement on oath by way of reply dated 16/06/2021. It is stated that due to

misunderstanding between the applicants and the non-applicant no. 2, cross

complaints were registered against the applicants and the non-applicant

no. 2. It is stated that the young members of the families have realized their

mistakes and have decided to resolve their dispute caused due to

misunderstanding. It is also stated that the non-applicant no. 2 does not want

to continue with his complaint against the applicants.

It is true that the offe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAYAJAY S/O RAMESHLAL METHANI AND 3 OTHERS – AppellantVersusSTATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS GADGE NAGAR AMRAVATI DIST.AMRAVATI AND ANOTHER – Respondent

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
AJAY S/O RAMESHLAL METHANI AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS GADGE NAGAR AMRAVATI DIST.AMRAVATI AND ANOTHER – Respondent