Advocates:
['ANIRUDDHA C JALTARE', 'APP', '', 'KHAN', 'R', 'SAURABH SINGHA', 'NAQEEB A Q PATEL', 'R']

Judgment

Judgment

1

1

apl364.19.odt

apl364.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 364/2019

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 364/2019

1]

1]

Meraj Hussain S/o Azhar Hussain

Meraj Hussain S/o Azhar Hussain,

,

Aged 35 years, Occ. Nil,

Aged 35 years, Occ. Nil,

2]

2]

Azhar Hussain S/o Gulam Hussain

Azhar Hussain S/o Gulam Hussain,

,

Aged 68 years, Occ. Business,

Aged 68 years, Occ. Business,

3]

3]

Shamshad Begam W/o Azhar Hussain

Shamshad Begam W/o Azhar Hussain,

,

Aged 60 years, Occ. Nil,

Aged 60 years, Occ. Nil,

4]

4]

Aadab Hussain S/o Azhar Hussain

Aadab Hussain S/o Azhar Hussain,

,

Aged 40 years, Occ. Business,

Aged 40 years, Occ. Business,

5]

5]

Shadab Hussain S/o Azhar Hussain

Shadab Hussain S/o Azhar Hussain,

,

Aged 36 years, Occ. Business,

Aged 36 years, Occ. Business,

All R/o. Major Dhyanchand Ward,

All R/o. Major Dhyanchand Ward,

Behind Amar Talkies, Kazi Mohalla

Behind Amar Talkies, Kazi Mohalla

Seoni, Tah. Dist. Seoni (M.P.)

Seoni, Tah. Dist. Seoni (M.P.)

6]

6]

Rana Shadab W/o Salim Zahir Ansari

Rana Shadab W/o Salim Zahir Ansari,

,

Aged 38 years, Occ. Household

Aged 38 years, Occ. Household

7]

7]

Salim Zahir Ansari

Salim Zahir Ansari,

,

Aged 40 years, Occ. Business

Aged 40 years, Occ. Business

6 & 7 R/o. Shalimar Furniture,

6 & 7 R/o. Shalimar Furniture,

(Former Salim Hotel),

(Former Salim Hotel),

Mominpura, Nagpur (M.S.)

Mominpura, Nagpur (M.S.)

….

….

APPLICANT(S)

APPLICANT(S)

//

//

VERSUS //

VERSUS //

1]

1]

State of Maharashtra

State of Maharashtra,

,

Through Police Station Officer,

Through Police Station Officer,

Bhandara

Bhandara

ANSARI

ANSARI

Judgment

Judgment

2

2

apl364.19.odt

apl364.19.odt

2]

2]

Durre Shahewar W/o Meraj Hussain

Durre Shahewar W/o Meraj Hussain,

,

Aged 31 years, Occ. Doctor,

Aged 31 years, Occ. Doctor,

R/o. C/o. Gulamus Saiyyadin,

R/o. C/o. Gulamus Saiyyadin,

Mahal Ward, Bhandara

Mahal Ward, Bhandara

….

…. NON-APPLICANT(S)

NON-APPLICANT(S)

*******************************************************************

*******************************************************************

Shri A.C. Jaltare, Advocate for the applicant(s)

Shri A.C. Jaltare, Advocate for the applicant(s)

Shri S.M. Ghodeswar, APP

Shri S.M. Ghodeswar, APP for the non-applicant/State

for the non-applicant/State

Shri N. Patel, Advocate for the non-applicant no. 2

Shri N. Patel, Advocate for the non-applicant no. 2

*******************************************************************

*******************************************************************

CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

AUGUST

AUGUST

11

11

, 2021

, 2021

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT

: (PER:-

: (PER:-

AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)

AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)

1]

Heard.

2]

RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith.

3]

This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure challenging registration of F.I.R. No. 23/2019 dated 08/01/2019

registered with the non-applicant no. 1 - Police Station for the offences

punishable under Sections 498-A & 34 of the Indian Penal Code & Section 4

of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

4]

The first information report came to be registered against the

applicants with the accusations that marriage between the applicant no. 1

and non-applicant no. 2 was solemnized on 24/12/2011. After few days of

ANSARI

ANSARI

Judgment

Judgment

3

3

apl364.19.odt

apl364.19.odt

marriage, the applicants physically and mentally harassed the non-applicant

no. 2 for non payment of dowry and therefore the non-applicant no. 2 lodged

first information report with the non-applicant no. 1 – Police Station.

5]

During the pendency of the investigation, the parties have

mutually resolved their dispute. The applicants and the non-applicant no. 2

have filed joint settlement pursis stating that