HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
NIVRUTTI S/O GANESH GEBAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAH.THR. PSO HIWARKHED TQ.TELHARA DIST.AKOLA – Respondent
['VIPUL BABARAO BHISE', '', 'JAYWANT Y GHURDE', 'APP']
(1) 9.9-A.411.416.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.411 OF 2021
Nivrutti s/o Ganesh Gebad
Vs.
State of Maharashtra through PSO, Hiwarkhed, Tq. Telhara, Dist. Akola
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.416 OF 2021
Rajivkumar s/o Bisheshernath Shingari
Vs.
State of Maharashtra through PSO, Hiwarkhed, Tq. Telhara, Dist. Akola
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Court'
s or Judge'
s orders
appearances, Court'
s orders of directions
and Registrar'
s orders
Shri J. Y. Ghurde, Advocate for applicant in ABA No.411/2021
Shri Ashwin Deshpande, Advocate for applicant in ABA No.416/
2021.
Shri H. D. Dubey, APP for non-applicant/State.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI, J.
DATED : 11/08/2021
In anticipation of arrest in Crime No.259 of
2021, registered with Police Station, Hiwarkhed, District
Akola for the offences punishable under Sections 420,
409 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the
applicants are claiming pre-arrrest protection.
2.
The applicant of Criminal Application (ABA)
No. 416 of 2021 namely Rajivkumar was working as
Bank Manager at Adgaon Branch of Central Bank of India
(2) 9.9-A.411.416.2021
whilst applicant of Criminal Application (ABA) No. 411
of 2021 namely Nivruti is agriculturist.
3.
It is the prosecution case that the Central
Bank of India has floated various loan schemes for the
farmers. The applicants along with others used to
contact tribals under pretext of sanctioning loan and
collected their documents. They have taken thumb
impression and signatures of the prospective borrowers
on various forms, slips etc. On the basis of forged
documents, the loans were got sanctioned and the
amount was misappropriated. Thus, the applicants have
committed fraud and duped the bank as well as cheated
number of tribals.
4.
This Court has granted interim protection to
both applicants vide order dated 23.07.2021 on
assurance of applicants depositing certain amount to
show their bonafide. It reveals from the FIR that during
special audit it was revealed that there were total 24
bogus loan cases involving embezzlement of
Rs.35,9,483/-. Both applicants have deposited
(3) 9.9-A.411.416.2021
Rs.17,50,000/- each in the Court i.e. total amount of
Rs.35,00,000/- matching to the amount of
embezzlement.
5.
The State resisted bail by filing reply /
affidavit and pointing towards seriousness of crime
learned APP submits that there is likelihood of coming
forward some more cases of fraud. However, prima facie
it appears that already special audit has done, which has
examined all the loan transactions and came to the
conclusions that the total embezzlement is of
Rs.35,00,000/-. The period of fraud was from
06.05.2017 to 29.11.2019 and by the time applicant
Rajivkumar a Manager has been transferred. All the
documents are seized during the course of investigation.
Having regard to the special feature, that entire
embezzled amount of Rs. 35,00,000/- has been
deposited in this Court, the appellants’ liberty can be
protected by directing them to co-operate in the process
of investigation. In view of that, following order:
(4) 9.9-A.411.416.2021
(i)
Criminal Application (ABA) Nos. 411 of
2021 and 416 of 2021 are allowed.
(ii) Interim common order dated 23.07.2021
is hereby made absolute on the same terms and
conditions with modification that both
applicants shall attend concerned Police Station
on every Sunday in between 11.00 a.m. to 2.00
p.m. till filing of charge-sheet or for the period
of six months whichever is earlier.
(iii) The amount of Rs. 35,00,000/- deposited
in Court be transferred to the account of Trial
Court for its disposal in his discretion strictly
according to law.
JUDGE
Sarkate