SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
GANESH S/O RAMCHANDRA WADTE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. P.S.O. DARWHA, YAVATMAL – Respondent


Advocates:
['AADIL ANWAR J MIRZA', 'POONAM P MOONPOONAM P MOON', 'POONAM P MOON', 'APP']

aba.371.16

1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Criminal Application [ABA] No.371 of 2016

(Ganesh Ramchandra Wadte

vs.

State of Maharashtra, through its P.S.O. Darwha, District Yavatmal)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Office notes, Office Memoranda of

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders

or directions and Registrar’s orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Shri A.J. Mirza, Advocate for the Applicant.

Shri R.S. Nayak, A.P.P. for the Non-Applicant/State.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE

: 5 th JULY, 2016.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the

learned A.P.P. for the State.

I find no substance in the argument of the learned

Counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely

involved in the offence at the behest of one Ashish Chavan, who

is alleged to be the eye-witness of the incident and against

whom, the sister-in-law of the applicant had filed a complaint,

and because of which, there was an enmity between the

appli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top