SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, MAN PROJECT DIVSION, KHAMGAON – Appellant
Versus
GOVT. OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BULDHANA AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['PURUSHOTTAM PATIL', 'SN GAIKWAD', 'R P MASURKAR', 'ADV']

caf3182.15.odt 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CAF No. 3182 of 2015 In FA (St) No. 14063 of 2015

EE v. Govt of Maharashtra and ors

Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,

appearances, Court's orders of directions

Court's or Judge's

orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr P. B. Patil, Adv for applicant

Ms R. Deshpande, AGP for respdts 1,2

Mr R. P. Masurkar, Adv for respdts 3,4

Coram: B. P. Dharmadhikari And

V. M. Deshpande, JJ

Date : 9 th December 2015

1.

Prayer is to condone delay of 82 days

in filing appeal under Section 54 of the Land

Acquisition Act. The request for condonation of

delay is being strongly opposed by learned

counsel for respondents no. 3 and 4. Learned

Assistant Government Pleader does not oppose

the prayer.

2.

We have perused affidavit.

The

developments after passing of impugned

judgment by the Reference Court are datewise

furnished and we do not see any undue time gap.

Office compliance has been done regularly.

Therefore, delay is co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top