HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
RASHMI AMOL MADANKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. P.SO. P.S. BORGAON, TAH. and DIST. SATARA, MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
ABA 431/2019
['ANIL A DHAWAS', 'MRS SHITAL A DHAWASMRS SHITAL A DHAWAS', 'SHRIKANT B BAWANTHADE', 'MRS SHITAL A DHAWAS', 'APP FOR STATE']
1 aba431.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
Criminal Application (ABA) No. 431 of 2019
Rashmi Amol Madankar
Vs.
State of Mah. Through P.S. Borgaon Tah. & Dist. Satara
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mr. A.A. Dhawas, Advocate for applicant
Mr. M.J.Khan, APP for non-applicant.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.
DATED : JULY 4, 2019
Heard Mr. A.A. Dhawas, learned Advocate
for the applicant as also Mr. M.J. Khan, learned APP
for the non-applicant / State on whom an advance
copy of this application was served.
The learned counsel for the applicant has
approached this Court seeking urgent transit
anticipatory bail for the applicant in connection with
FIR dated 05/06/2019, registered at Police Station
Borgaon Dist. Satara against her and three other
accused persons for the offences punishable under
Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 472, 475, 120-B R/w
34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The applicant has approached this Court
contending that she has serious apprehension of being
2 aba431.19.odt
arrested by the police officers said to have reached
Nagpur from Police Station Borgaon Dist. Satara to
arrest her in connection with the said FIR. It is
contended that the applicant had met with an accident
in the recent past and that she is in such a medical
condition that it would be not appropriate that she,
being a woman, is arrested and transported all the way
to District Satara, which is said to be about 700 Km.
from Nagpur. In support of the said contention
pertaining to medical condition, documents have been
placed on record. It is also submitted on behalf of the
applicant that she is ready to co-operate with the
investigation and that if transit anticipatory bail is
granted for a short period of time, she would approach
the appropriate Court for grant of anticipatory bail.
Although, the learned APP has opposed
grant of relief in the present application, since this
Court is not considering the matter on merits and only
on the question of granting an opportunity to the
applicant to approach the appropriate Court for grant
of anticipatory bail, the contentions raised on behalf of
the learned APP are not being considered on merits.
Considering the peculiar facts and
circumstances of the present case, particularly as the
applicant is a lady and she has undertaken to co-
operate with the investigation and the prayer in the
present case is made only for grant of transit
anticipatory bail to enable the applicant to approach
3 aba431.19.odt
the appropriate Court, the present application deserves
to be granted and limited relief in the following
manner is granted to the applicant herein.
(A)
In the event, the applicant is arrested in
connection with Crime No. 96 of 2019, registered at
Police Station Borgaon Dist. Satara, she shall be
released on transit anticipatory bail only for a period of
two weeks on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- and
surety in the like amount.
It is made clear that this order shall cease
to operate on expiry of period of two weeks from
today.
(B)
During this period of two weeks, the
applicant shall approach the appropriate Court for
seeking necessary orders.
The appropriate Court would be at libert