BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
AJAY S/O RAMKHILAWAN YADAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR PSO PS FREZARPURA, DIST. AMRAVATI – Respondent
BA 1258/2020
14BA 1258.2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 1258 OF 2020
(Ajay s/o Ramkhilawan Yadao, Amravati Vs. State of Maharashtra)
__________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court'
s orders of directions
Court'
s or Judge'
s orders.
and Registrar'
s Orders.
Shri R.M. Daga, Advocate for the applicant.
Shri H.D. Dubey, A.P.P. for the respondent.
.....
CORAM : PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.
JANUARY 06, 2021.
Heard.
2]
This is an application for grant of bail in
Crime No. 704/2020 dated 30/07/2020 registered at
Police Station, Frezarpura, District - Amravati for the
offences punishable under Sections 302, 324, 341,
143, 147, 148, 149, 294, 504 and 506 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860.
3]
The allegation against the present
applicant, as per the prosecution case, is that he
along with three other co-accused committed murder
of the deceased Kanhaiyya Lidia by means of an axe.
4]
It is stated that the cause of murder is the
dispute between the applicant and the deceased with
regard to stanch smell coming from the cattle shed,
owned by the present applicant. It is further stated
14BA 1258.2020
2
that while the deceased was going on a motorcycle,
at some distance from his house, the applicant,
armed with an axe, and that three other co-accused,
armed with wooden rods, intervened and stopped
the deceased, and started assaulting him on all over
his body.
5]
The specific role attributed to the present
applicant is that he assaulted the deceased with axe
on his head and also on other parts of his body. The
cause of death, as per the postmortem report, is head
injury.
6]
Shri Daga, learned counsel for the
applicant, vehemently submitted that all other co-
accused, who also allegedly participated in assaulting
the deceased on head, have been released on bail by
the trial Court. He further submitted that the
postmortem report does not show any stab injury
caused by means of an axe.
7]
I have perused the MLC report. Dr. N.S.
Solanke, who examined the deceased on 30/07/2020
at District Hospital, Amravati, noticed following
injuries :-
i)
Lacerated wound of grievous nature of
size 3 X 2 X 1 cm over left parietal region.
14BA 1258.2020
3
ii)
Abrasion of moderate nature of 4 X 2 cm.
The inquest panchanama shows wound on
the middle portion of head of size 4 cm, having two
stitches.
The postmortem report also reflects
stitched wound towards left parietal region, and
diffuse scalp hemorrhage of size 60 meter over side
skull. The contention that this injury is surgically
intervened, cannot be accepted.
8]
There are eye-witnesses to the incident.
The incident is not the outcome of a sudden quarrel,
rather it appears that it is a premeditated plan. The
present applicant appears to be the main accused.
9]
In the given facts, so also considering the
role attributed to the present applicant, this Court is
of the opinion that he does not deserve parity. Hence,
the application is rejected.
JUDGE
Sumit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.