SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
BHAGYASHREE PRASHANT WASANKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. POLICE STATION OFFICER, POLICE STATION, AMBAZARI, NAGPUR (NOW WITH EOW) – Respondent


Advocates:
['CHAITANYA B BARVE', '', 'DEVENDRA V CHAUHAN', 'SWAPNIL S SHINGANE']

1 criw.p. 688-2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

Criminal Writ Petition No. 688 of 2020

PETITIONER :

Bhagyashree Prashant Wasankar

Aged about 38 years,

Occupation : Business,

R/o Plot No. 247, Hill I road,

Shivaji Nagar, Nagpur

Vs.

RESPONDENT :

The State of Maharashtra, Through

Police Station Officer, Police Station,

Ambazari, Nagpur Now with EOW

Mr. D.V. Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. C.B. Barve, Advocate for

the petitioner

Ms. Shamsi Haider, APP for the respondent

CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

RESERVED ON : 05.07.2021

PRONOUNCED ON: 15.07.2021

JUDGMENT

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel

appearing for rival parties.

2.

The question that arises for consideration in

this Writ Petition is, as to whether a witness appearing

2 criw.p. 688-2020.odt

for the prosecution in a sessions trial can produce

documents which were not part of the charge-sheet filed

before the Court and whether such procedure for

production of documents directly by the prosecution

witness is contemplated under the provisions of the

Cod

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top