HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
LALITKUMAR S/O. LATE NANDKISHORE LOHIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. LAKADGANJ POLICE STATION NAGPUR – Respondent
ABA 488/2018
['SHYAM DAYARAM DEWANI', 'DIPENN S JAGYASIDIPENN S JAGYASI', 'R S DEWANI', 'SAHIL S DEWANI', 'DIPENN S JAGYASI', 'APP']
aba486.18+.O.odt 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.486 OF 2018
(Rajkumar Hanumanprasad Saboo Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. PSO PS Lakadganj,
Nagpur)
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.487 OF 2018
(Suhasini w/o Lalitkumar Lohai Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. PSO PS Lakadganj,
Nagpur)
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.488 OF 2018
(Lalitkumar s/o Late Nandkishore Lohia Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. PSO PS
Lakadganj, Nagpur)
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.489 OF 2018
(Saket s/o Lalitkumar Lohia and another Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. PSO PS
Lakadganj, Nagpur)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions
Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar’s Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Shyam Dewani, Advocate for Applicant.
Shri N.B. Jawade, APP for Non-Applicant/State.
CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO, J.
DATE OF RESERVING THE ORDER:
27.07.2018
DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE ORDER:
31.07.2018
These applications under section 438 of the
Criminal Procedure Code (Code) are moved by the
applicants who are apprehending arrest in Crime 131/2017
registered with the Lakadganj Police Station Nagpur for
offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 468 and 471
read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2]
The complainant Laxmikant Deviduttji Murarka
has moved an application seeking permission to assist the
prosecution. The said application is allowed.
aba486.18+.O.odt 2
3]
The substratum of the prosecution case is that
the original commencement certificate – building permit
signed
by
the
Town
Planner
is
permit
16-A/BP/Nagpur/TP/NMC/10 dated 30.04.2012. A forged
and/or fraudulent document is created and the building
permit is shown as 116-A/BP/Nagpur/TP/NMC/10 dated
30.03.2012. The underlying object, presumably is to claim
some benefits under the income tax law by representing
that the commencement certificate – building permit in
respect of apartment scheme “Garden Enclave” which is a
project of the “Suhasini Realty” of which Smt. Suhasini
Lohia, applicant in Criminal Application (ABA) 487/2018 is
the owner, was issued in the financial year 2012-2013.
4]
The applicants assert, and there is no demur,
that although the project is situated within the jurisdiction
of the Ganeshpeth Police Station, a disgruntled purchaser of
an apartment Mr. Laxmikant Murarka lodged complaint
dated 11.12.2015 with the Lakadganj Police Station.
The gist of the complaint is that benefits under the income
tax act were availed by creating a forged or fabricated
document to show that the commencement certificate –
building permit was issued on 30.03.2012. Be it noted, that
it is not disputed that the commencement certificate dated
30.04.2012 is duly issued. The complaint lodged by
Mr. Laxmikant Murarka, which is the basis of the
investigation, is that the date 30.04.2012 is fraudulently
shown as 30.03.2012 to claim income tax benefit.
aba486.18+.O.odt 3
5]
A few uncontroverted facts may now be noted.
The offence is allegedly committed on 30.04.2012 or
thereabout. It is not disputed by the prosecution, in
response to the Court query, that neither the Income Tax
Department nor the Nagpur Municipal Corporation lodged a
complaint. The complaint is lodged by Mr. Laximkant
Murarka on 11.12.2016. The applicants assert, which
assertion is not disputed, that he is disgruntled apartment
purchaser, and is the President of the Society who put forth
several grievances leading to a meeting dated 26.04.2015.
The furthe