SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT NAGPUR
RAVI S/O JAGATRAO INGLE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. FOREST DEPARTMENT, AMRAVATI – Respondent


Advocates:
['JEMINI BRIJMOHAN KASAT', 'VINAY V DAHATVINAY V DAHAT', 'VINAY V DAHAT', 'APP']

aba.593.16 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Criminal Application [ABA] No.593 of 2016

(Ravi Jagatrao Ingle

vs.

The State of Maharashtra, through Forest Department, Amravati)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Office notes, Office Memoranda of

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders

or directions and Registrar’s orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Shri J.B. Kasat, Advocate for the Applicant.

Shri S.J. Kadu, A.P.P. for the Non-Applicant/State.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE

: 28

th SEPTEMBER, 2016.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and

the learned A.P.P. for the State.

By this application, the applicant is seeking

anticipatory bail in P.O.R. No.45/2014, registered against him

for the offence punishable under Section 51 of the Wild Life

(Protection) Act, 1972 (‘the Act of 1972’ for short) in relation

to violation of Sections 9, 39(3)(a)(b)(c), 44(1)(b), 48(a), 49

and 49-B(1)(b) of the Act of 1972.

Upon receiving an information that a 'G

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top