SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MOHD. RAZIQUE S/O ABDUL GAFFAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH OFFICER INCHARGE OF POLICE STATION, GADGENAGAR, AMRAVATI AND ANOTHER – Respondent
APL 759/2015



Advocates:
['RAHEEL ANWAR J MIRZA', '', 'AADIL ANWAR J MIRZA', 'APP', '', 'DR A H JAMAL', 'VAKESHWAR RAJENDRA BASESHANKAR', 'Q M QUTUB ZAFAR', 'FOR/R']

Judgment

Judgment

1

1

apl759.15.odt

apl759.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 759/2015

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 759/2015

1]

1]

Mohd. Razique S/o Abdul Gaffar

Mohd. Razique S/o Abdul Gaffar,

,

Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business,

Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business,

2]

2]

Mohd. Sharique S/o Abdul Gaffar

Mohd. Sharique S/o Abdul Gaffar,

,

Aged about 40 years, Occ. Business,

Aged about 40 years, Occ. Business,

3]

3]

Nilofer Shaikh W/o Mohd. Sharique

Nilofer Shaikh W/o Mohd. Sharique,

,

Aged about 32 years, Occ. House wife,

Aged about 32 years, Occ. House wife,

4]

4]

Mohd. Arif S/o Abdul Gaffar

Mohd. Arif S/o Abdul Gaffar,

,

Aged about 34 years, Occ. Mechanic,

Aged about 34 years, Occ. Mechanic,

5]

5]

Samina Shaikh W/o Mohd. Arif

Samina Shaikh W/o Mohd. Arif,

,

Aged about 30 years, Occ. Housewife,

Aged about 30 years, Occ. Housewife,

6]

6]

Mohd. Zahid S/o Abdul Gaffar

Mohd. Zahid S/o Abdul Gaffar,

,

Aged about 37 years, Occ. Business,

Aged about 37 years, Occ. Business,

All R/o. Plot No. 8, Kohinoor Society,

All R/o. Plot No. 8, Kohinoor Society,

Pandharkawda Road, Yavatmal

Pandharkawda Road, Yavatmal

7]

7]

Yasmeen Tabbasum W/o Quazi Noor Ali

Yasmeen Tabbasum W/o Quazi Noor Ali,

,

Aged about 42 years, Occ. Service

Aged about 42 years, Occ. Service

R/o. Kohinoor Society Near Kohinoor

R/o. Kohinoor Society Near Kohinoor

Masjid Wani Road, Yavatmal

Masjid Wani Road, Yavatmal

8]

8]

Heena Anjum D/o Abdul Gaffar

Heena Anjum D/o Abdul Gaffar,

,

Aged about 32 years, Occ. Household,

Aged about 32 years, Occ. Household,

R/o. Plot No. 8, Kohinoor Society,

R/o. Plot No. 8, Kohinoor Society,

Pandharkawda Road, Yavatmal

Pandharkawda Road, Yavatmal

….

….

APPLICANT(S)

APPLICANT(S)

//

//

VERSUS //

VERSUS //

1]

1]

State of Maharashtra

State of Maharashtra,

,

Through Officer In-charge of Police Station,

Through Officer In-charge of Police Station,

Gadgenagar, Amravati

Gadgenagar, Amravati

A

ANSARI

NSARI

Judgment

Judgment

2

2

apl759.15.odt

apl759.15.odt

2]

2]

Saleha Tabassum W/o Mohd. Razique

Saleha Tabassum W/o Mohd. Razique

@ Saleha Tabassum D/o Ashfaque Ahmed

@ Saleha Tabassum D/o Ashfaque Ahmed,

,

Aged about 26 years, R/o. C/o. Ashfaque

Aged about 26 years, R/o. C/o. Ashfaque

Ahemad Mohd. Rafique, Ahbab Colony,

Ahemad Mohd. Rafique, Ahbab Colony,

Walgaon Road, Amravati

Walgaon Road, Amravati

….

…. NON-APPLICANT(S)

NON-APPLICANT(S)

*******************************************************************

*******************************************************************

Shri R.J. Mirza, Advocate for the applicant(s)

Shri R.J. Mirza, Advocate for the applicant(s)

Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for the non-applicant no. 1

Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for the non-applicant no. 1

*******************************************************************

*******************************************************************

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ

& AMIT B. BORKAR

& AMIT B. BORKAR

, JJ.

, JJ.

MARCH 08, 2021

MARCH 08, 2021

ORAL JUDGMENT

ORAL JUDGMENT :

: (PER:- AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)

(PER:- AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)

1]

Heard.

2]

By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, the applicants have challenged registration of F.I.R.

No. 116/2015 dated 01/04/2015 registered with the non-applicant no. 1 –

Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 34 of the

Indian Penal Code.

3]

The first information report came to be registered against the

applicants with the accusations that the applicants treated the non-applicant

no. 2 with physical and mental cruelty.

A

ANSARI

NSARI

Judgment

Judgment

3

3

apl759.15.odt

apl759.15.odt

4]

The applicants have therefore challenged registration of the first

information report by filing the present application. This Court on

29/10/2015 issued notice to the non-app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top