HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
BROOKE BOND EMPLOYEES UNION THR ITS GENERAL SECRETARY – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED THR ITS RETGIONAL MANAGER AND OTHERS – Respondent
LPA 507/2011
['DS THAKUR', 'SD THAKUR', 'HV THAKUR/CAV/R- TO', '', 'VR & HV THAKUR/R']
LPA 507-11
1
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 507/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.
1133
/20
02
(D)
WITH
CROSS-OBJECTION
STAMP
NO.
2805/2012
Brooke Bond Employees Union,
C/o R.T. Wankhede, Plot No.127,
Shilpa Nagar, Narendra Nagar, Nagpur
400015 through its General Secretary.
APPELLANT
.....VERSUS..…
1.
Hindustan Unilever Limited,
through its Regional Manager,
having its office at Uttara, Plot No.2,
Sector 11, CBD Belapur, New Mumbai 400 614.
2.
Hindustan Lever Limited,
through its Chairman, Hindustan Lever House,
165/166, Backbay Reclamation, Mumbai.
3.
M/s Hindustan Lever Ltd.,
Hindustan Lever House, 165/166, Backbay
Reclamation, Mumbai 400 020 through
its Regional Personnel Manager (West),
(Unit Manager-Regional Accounts Office,Nagpur).
4.
Member,
Industrial Court, Maharashtra,
Nagpur Bench, Civil Lines, Nagpur.
R ESPONDENTS
__________________________________________________________________________
Shri S.D. Thakur and Shri D.S. Thakur, counsel for the appellant.
Shri H.V. Thakur, counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND G.A. SANAP, JJ.
DATE ON WHICH ARGUMENTS WERE HEARD :
05
TH
OCTOBER
, 2021
.
DATE
ON
WHICH JUDGMENT IS PRONOUNCED
:
29
TH
OCTOBER,
2021
.
JUDGMENT (PER : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
This letters patent appeal filed under Clause 15 of the letters
patent takes exception to the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated
21.10.2011 in Writ Petition 1133 of 2002. By the said judgment, the writ
petition preferred by the respondent nos.1 to 3 herein for challenging the
judgment passed by the Industrial Court Nagpur on 27.02.2002 has been
allowed and that judgment passed by the Industrial Court allowing the
complaint filed by the appellant has been set aside.
LPA 507-11
2
Judgment
2.
The brief facts that are relevant for deciding the challenges as
raised are that it is the case of the appellant-Union through its General
Secretary that it comprises of the employees of the erstwhile Brooke Bond
India Limited. The said company was subsequently acquired by
Hindustan Lever Limited through its parent company in the year 1984.
The parent company had also acquired another company named Lipton
India Limited. Both these companies were then merged in the year 1994
to form Brooke Bond Lipton India Limited. This company was then
merged into Hindustan Lever Limited. According to Union the Federation
of its employees is the apex body of trade unions. From 1962 onwards
various agreements were entered into by the Federation with the
Management of Brooke Bond India Limited concerning service conditions
and pay-scales of its employees. According to the Union representing
about nineteen employees of the Regional Accounts Office, Nagpur the
activities of the Regional Accounts Office and the manufacturing activities
carried out at different factories especially the factory at Kanhan were
interrelated and interdependent. All of them were thus constituted one
industrial establishment. The services of the employees of Brooke Bond
India Limited were transferable from various factories to the Regional
Accounts Office and vice versa. On 05.01.2001 a notice of closure was
displayed by the Management at the Regional Accounts Office, Nagpur.
As per that notice which was not preceded by a notice of change as
required by Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, ‘the
Act of 1947’) the activities of the Regional Accounts Office, Nagpur were
LPA 507-11
3
Judgment
closed down. Since this notice of closure did not contain any reason and
was issued without granting any opportunity to the members of the
Union, the same resulted in commission of unfair labour practice within
the meaning of Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of
Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (for
short,