HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
RANGRAO KRISHNARAO CHOUDHARI – Appellant
Versus
MAHARSHI BABASAHEB KEDAR SAHAKARI SUT GIRNI, WANADONGRI THR. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 2188/2017
['PRABHAKAR C MARPAKWAR', '', 'VIKRAM PRABHAKAR MARPAKWAR', 'GOVERNMENT PLEADER', '', 'FOR/R- &', 'VILAS DAMUJI RAUT', 'FOR/R']
1 WP2188.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2188 OF 2017
PETITIONER
:Rangrao S/o Krishnarao Choudhari,
Aged about 46 years, Occu. Nil.
R/o At Post Brahmanwada,
Post Walni (Khandala), Tq. & Dist. Nagpur.
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
:1]Maharshi Babasaheb Kedar Sahakari Sut
Girni, Wanadongri, Tahsil Hingna,
District Nagpur,
Through its Managing Director.
2]The Presiding Officer,
First Labour Court, Civil Lines, Nagpur.
3]The Member,
Industrial Court, Civil Lines, Nagpur.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. V. P. Marpakwar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. V. D. Raut, Advocate for the respondent no.1
Mr. A. M. Kadukar, A.G.P. for respondent nos.2 and 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : V. M. DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2021
ORAL JUDGMENT
1.
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally
by consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
2 WP2188.17.odt
2.
Heard Mr. V. P. Marpakwar, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr. V. D. Raut, learned counsel for respondent no.1.
Respondent nos.2 and 3, who are formal parties, are represented by
Mr. A. M. Kadukar, learned Assistant Government Pleader.
3.
By this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the
judgment and order passed by the learned authority under the
Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 and the learned Judge, First
Labour Court, Nagpur dated 12.12.2005 in BIR Application No.
136/1997 filed on behalf of the petitioner, whereby the learned
Judge of the First Labour Court dismissed the application, together
with the judgment and order passed by the learned Member,
Industrial Court, Nagpur, the Appellate Authority, dated 19.07.2014
in BIR Appeal No. 02/2006, whereby the learned Appellate
Authority dismissed the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner and
confirmed the judgment and order dated 12.12.2005.
4.
The petitioner was working as a Winder with
respondent no.1 – company. He was served with a show cause
notice dated 02.05.1995 by the General Manager (Tech.) of
respondent no.1-Company. As per the show cause notice, on
24.04.1995, in the second shift, senior officer one Shri R.K. Jawade,
3 WP2188.17.odt
Spinning Master when gave a visit at 11.35 in the night at Winding
Department of respondent no.1-Company, that time it was found by
him that the petitioner was not on the machine and he was combing
his hairs. Upon that, said officer Shri Jawade asked the petitioner
that his shift is yet to over and therefore, he should immediately
resume his work. The show cause notice shows that upon that, the
petitioner abused Shri Jawade in very abusive language. Therefore,
Shri Jawade asked one Shri Mandwekar to call the Labour Officer
and the Watchman. Upon that, the petitioner got flared up and he
lifted one big iron container and made an assault with the same
upon Shri Jawade resulting into Shri Jawade suffering injuries. The
petitioner was, therefore, served with a notice for the following
misconducts :-
“1. M.S.O. 24(a) : Willful insubordination or disobedience
whether or not in combination with another
of any lawful and reasonable orders of a
superior ;
2. M.S.O. 24(c)
: Willful slowing down in performance or work
or abetment or instigation thereof ;
3. M.S.O. 24(h)
: Habitual breach of any standing order or any
law applicable to the establishment or any
rule made thereunder.
4. M.S.O. 24(L)
: Drunkenness, riotous, disorderly or indecent
behavior on the premises of establishment.
5. M.S.O. 24(k)
: Commission of any act subversive of discipline
or good behavior on the premises of the
establishment.”
4 WP2188.17.odt
5.
The petitioner, therefore, was dir