HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SAU. SMITA ASHISH GAJBE – Appellant
Versus
SHRI ASHISH ARUNRAO GAJBE – Respondent
MCA 18/2017
['SNEHA S DHOTE', 'PRASHANT PURUSHOTTAM DHOK', '', 'SANJAY GANESH BHANDARE', 'FOR/R']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Misc. Civil Application (Tr) 18/2017
Sau. Smita Ashish Gajbe V/s Shri Ashish Arunrao Gajbe
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions
Court's or Judge's
orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
Mrs. Sneha S. Dhote, Advocate (Appointed) for applicant
Mr. P.P. Dhoke, Advocate for respondent.
Coram: S.B. Shukre, J.
Date : 14
th July, 2017
Heard Mrs. S.S. Dhote, the learned
counsel for appellant and Shri Prashant Dhote,
the learned counsel for respondent.
I have also gone through the
contentions raised in the application and reply
filed by the learned counsel for the respondent.
It is seen that the proceedings initiated
under the provisions of the Protection of Women
from Domestic Violance Act, 2005, are presently
pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate
First Class, Chandrapur and the Divorce Petition
filed by the respondent against the applicant is
pending before Family Court No.3 at Nagpur.
It is further seen that the applicant is
admittedly residing at Taluka-Murwad, District
Thane where she is working as ‘Shikshan Sevak’. It
is obvious that the applicant would have to come to
Chandrapur for attending the various dates given
by the Court in the domestic violence proceedings
from Taluka-Murwad, Dist. Thane. The forum at
Nagpur, a place situated on the National Highway
as well as on the main railway line between
Mumbai and Kolkata, would be the most
convenient one for both the parties.
In view of the above there is no merit in
this application. Hence it is rejected. No costs.
JUDGE
nandurkar