SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MAHENDRA S/O VASANTRAO DUDHE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 6478/2016



Advocates:
['T G BANSOD', '(FILED IN COURT)(FILED IN COURT)', 'KHUSHBOO KISANLAL AGRAWAL', '(FILED IN COURT)']

1

WP6478-16

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

WRIT PETITION NO. 6478/2016

(MAHENDRA VASANTRAO DUDHE VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

Court's or Judge's orders

appearances, Court's orders of directions

and Registrar's orders

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Shri T.G. Bansod, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri A.A. Madiwale, A.G.P. for the respondents.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND

MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 22

, 2016.

By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged

the order of the Election Officer, dated 02.11.2016 rejecting

the nomination of the petitioner for contesting the election to

Darwha Nagar Parishad. Some ancillary prayers are also

made.

Shri Madiwale, the learned Assistant

Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, states

that this court may not show indulgence in this matter as the

election to Darwha Nagar Parishad is scheduled on

27.11.2016. It is stated that the election process has already

commenced and the symbols are also allotted to the

contesting candidates.

We uphold the objetion raised on behalf of the

respondents and decline to entertain the writ petition, after

the election process has commenced. It is laid down by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court time and again that the courts would

not normally interfere in election matters after the election

process has commenced. In the instant case, the election is

scheduled on 27.11.2016 and the symbols are already allotted

to the contesting candidates.

2

WP6478-16

In view of the aforesaid, we dismiss the writ

petition with no order as to costs.

The petitioner is free to avail the appropriate

remedy, if so advised.

The points raised in the petition are kept open.

JUDGE

JUDGE

APTE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top