SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORENSTEIN D'SOUZA AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
VIJITSIKAND @ VIJIT SINGH SIKAND AND 4 ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['ADV PADGAONKAR CHAITANYA PRAKASH', 'ADV R G RAMANI', '', 'ADV SHENVI KAKODKAR PRANAV SURYAJI']

WP No. 4/2019

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO. 4 OF 2019

Orenstein D'Souza & Another

….

Petitioners

Versus

Vijitsikand @ Vijit Singh Sikand & 4

others

….

Respondents

***

Mr. Chaitanya Padgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Mr. R.G. Ramani, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.

CORAM : C.V. BHADANG, J.

DATE : 4

th June, 2019

ORAL ORDER:

By this petition, the petitioners are challenging the

order dated 25.10.2018, passed by the learned Senior Civil

Judge at Margao in Special Civil Suit No. 52/2012/II. By the

impugned order, the learned Trial Court has dismissed

application (Exhibit-52), filed by the petitioners, under Order I

Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC, for short),

seeking their impleadment as defendants.

2.

The brief facts are that the respondent no. 1 has

filed the aforesaid suit, against the respondent nos. 2 to 5, for

specific performance of an agreement of sale dated

06.02.2008, allegedly executed by the respondent nos. 2 to 5.

WP No. 4/2019

2

3.

The petitioners filed an application (Exhibit-52) for

their impleadment, on the ground that the suit property,

comprising of survey nos. 83/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top