BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT GOA
NILESH PALYEKAR, PRESENTLY IN COLVALE JAIL, THR. NEHA PALYEKAR – Appellant
Versus
ANAND KANDOLKAR AND ANR – Respondent
CRIR 16/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2018
NILESH PALYEKAR, PRESENTLY IN
COLVALE JAIL, THR. NEHA PALYEKAR.,
... Petitioner
Versus
ANAND KANDOLKAR AND ANR.,
... Respondents
Mr. R. Chodankar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. J. Vaz, Advocate for the respondent no.1.
Coram:- PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
Date:-
21st February 2018
P.C.
The Petitioner has been convicted by learned JMFC, Mapusa
in Other Acts/NIA/179/2012/B for the offence punishable under
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He has been
sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for four months and
to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default to undergo
simple imprisonment for a period of 2 months. The petitioner
preferred an appeal before the Sessions Judge, North Goa
bearing Criminal Appeal No.67/2015. Learned Additional
Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal on 2.1.2018 against which
present Criminal Revision Applicant is preferred.
2. A joint application for compounding of the offence is
moved by the petitioner and the respondent no.1 who are duly
identified by their respective Advocates. It is submitted that
2
CRIR/16/2018
matter has been amicably settled between the parties and
therefore, respondent no.1 does not wish to proceed with the
matter. It is also submitted by the learned Counsel for the
petitioner that entire amount of the compensation has already
been deposited in the Court.
3. In view of the above, permission to compound the offence
punishable under Section 138 of the NIA is granted. The
petitioner is acquitted of the offence punishable under Section
138 of the NIA. The Judgment and order of conviction passed by
the learned JMFC, Mapusa in Other Acts/NIA/179/2012/B and
confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal
No.67/2015 is set aside. The petitioner be released forthwith
from the judicial custody, if not required in any other case and on
depositing 15% of the cheque amount in favour of Goa State
Legal Services Authority, in view of the Judgement of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Damodar Prabhu Vs.
Sayyed Babalal H.[(2010)5 SCC 663].
4. Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of.
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
vn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.