SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MR. CEZORIO D'SOUZA AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
MR. ROHIDAS P. KANDOLKAR AND 4 ORS – Respondent


(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e)

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

APPELLATE SIDE

WRIT PETITION NO. 482 OF 2003

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Office Note, Office Memoranda

of Quorum, appearances, Court’s

Court’s or Judge’s Orders

orders or directions and

Registrar’s orders.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Shri J. Godinho, advocate for the

petitioners.

Shri S. Karpe, advocate appointed

under Legal Aid Scheme for

respondent no.1.

Shri V. Pangam, advocate appointed

under Legal Aid Scheme for

respondent no.2.

Shri J. A. Lobo, advocate

appointed under Legal Aid Scheme for

respondent no.3 & 4.

CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J.

DATE : 18th March, 2004

P.C.:

Heard learned counsel for the

petitioners as well as the

respondents. Being an interlocutory

Order, I am not inclined to

interfere in exercise of the

discretionary jurisdiction of this

Court under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India, specially

when the learned District Judge had

held that the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top