BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT GOA
PERNOD RICARD INDIA PVT. LTD., REP., THR. ITS. MANAGER AND DULY CONST. ATT., MANOJ MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GOA, THR. THE SECRETARY, DEPT. OF FINANCE, REVENUE AND CONTROL DIVISION AND 3 ORS – Respondent
WP 252/2020
['ADV KAIF NOORANI', 'ADV SAPNA MORDEKAR', '', '', '']
1 WP NO.252-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.252 OF 2020
M/s Pernod Ricard India Private Limited
A company incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 having one of
its offices at Plot No. 99 & 100
Bicholim Industrial Estate
Bicholim, Goa and registered office
at 5th floor, D-3 District Centre,
Saket, New Delhi - 110017
Represented through its
Manager-Manufacturing and
Duly Constituted attorney
Mr. Manoj Mishra.
… Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Goa
through the Secretary
Department of Finance Revenue
and Control Division Secretariat
Porvorim Panaji, Goa.
2. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Department of Commercial Taxes
Commercial Tax Office
Panaji Ward, Serra Building,
1
st Floor Near All India Radio,
Altinho, Panaji, Goa
3. Additional Commissioner of Commercial
Taxes, Department of Commercial Taxes
2 WP NO.252-2020
Commercial Tax Office Panaji Ward,
Serra Building, 1st Floor,
Near All India Radio, Altinho
Panaji, Goa.
4. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Office of Commercial Tax Officer
Bicholim Ward.
... Respondents
Mr. Tarun Gulati, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rony John and Kaif
Noorani, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate General with Ms. S. Mordekar, Additional
Government Advocate for the Respondents.
Coram:- M. S. SONAK &
SMT.
M. S. JAWALKAR, JJ.
Date:-
5
th
April 2021
JUDGMENT (Per M. S. Sonak, J.):
Heard Mr. Tarun Gulati learned Senior Advocate who appears
along with Mr. Rony John and Kaif Noorani for the Petitioner and Mr.
D. Pangam, the learned Advocate General who appears along with Ms.
S. Mordekar, learned Additional Government Advocate for the
Respondents.
2.
The petitioner, by instituting the present petition seeks the
following substantive reliefs:
3 WP NO.252-2020
(a) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue an appropriate
Writ, Order or Direction and declare that the levy of tax under
Section 3 of the Entry Tax Act, the machinery provisions
contained in Chapter IV and the levy of penalty under Section
19 of the Entry Tax Act are ultra vires Articles 265 and 300A of
the Constitution with respect to the entry of all goods (other
than motor vehicles) into a local area within the state of Goa;
(b) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue an appropriate
Writ, Order or Direction and declare that the Petitioner is not
liable to pay tax or penalty in respect of the import of CAB into
the State of Goa under the Entry Tax Act;
(c) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a issue an
appropriate Writ, Order or Direction striking down the
provisions of Section 3 of the Entry Tax Act insofar as it is
invoked as a charging provision for the levy of tax on entry of
goods into a local area within the State of Goa, for the reason
that it does not provide for a measure or value on which the rate
of tax is sought to be applied;
(d) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of
Certiorari or a Writ in the nature of Certiorari under Article 226
of the Constitution of India or any other Writ, Order or
Direction, calling for the records and proceedings pertaining to
the Impugned Order dated 27.02.2020 passed by the Goa
Administrative Tribunal in Entry of Goods Appeal No. 1/2020,
and after examining the validity, legality and propriety thereof,
to be pleased to quash and set aside the same;”
3.
Mr. Gulati, the learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner, to
begin with, submitted that the order dated 27.03.2020 made by the
Goa Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) in Appeal No.1/2020 warrants
interference, because, the Tribunal, applied incorrect principles whilst