SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VISHAL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGER, MAYIL VAGANAN – Appellant
Versus
LAXMIKANT D. NAIK KARMALI – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHIVRAJ GAONKAR', '', 'FATIMAD DIAS', 'ERUSHKA DIAS']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION NO. 1 OF 2020, WRIT

PETITION NO.174 OF 2021, CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 20

OF 21 AND 5 OF 2020 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.

58 OF 2020.

APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION NO. 1 OF 2020.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.174 OF 2021

WITH

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2021

IN

WRIT PETITION NO.174 OF 2021

WITH

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2020

IN

APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION NO. 1 OF 2020.

WITH

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO 58 OF 2020.

IN

APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION NO. 1 OF 2020.

VISHAL INSFRASRUCTURE LTD., REP.

BY ITS MANAGER MAYIL VAGANAN

VS

LAXMIKANT D. NAIK KARMALI.

…. Applicant.

…. Respondent.

Shri S. Gaonkar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri P. A. Kholkar, Advocate for the respondent.

Coram: DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

Date: 30th March 2021.

ORAL ORDER:

2

Introduction:

A person, though not a lawyer, is well-versed in conducting

arbitration proceedings. Let us call him 'prosecutor'. A company

contracts with him; under that contract, he leads the proceedings for

the Company before the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top