VISHAL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGER, MAYIL VAGANAN – Appellant
Versus
LAXMIKANT D. NAIK KARMALI – Respondent
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION NO. 1 OF 2020, WRIT
PETITION NO.174 OF 2021, CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 20
OF 21 AND 5 OF 2020 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
58 OF 2020.
APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION NO. 1 OF 2020.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.174 OF 2021
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2021
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.174 OF 2021
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2020
IN
APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION NO. 1 OF 2020.
WITH
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO 58 OF 2020.
IN
APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION NO. 1 OF 2020.
VISHAL INSFRASRUCTURE LTD., REP.
BY ITS MANAGER MAYIL VAGANAN
VS
LAXMIKANT D. NAIK KARMALI.
…. Applicant.
…. Respondent.
Shri S. Gaonkar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri P. A. Kholkar, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram: DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
Date: 30th March 2021.
ORAL ORDER:
2
Introduction:
A person, though not a lawyer, is well-versed in conducting
arbitration proceedings. Let us call him 'prosecutor'. A company
contracts with him; under that contract, he leads the proceedings for
the Company before the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.