RAMKRISHNA VITHAL NAIK AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
MANDIR MADHU NAIK AND ANR – Respondent
1
sa no.82 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
SECOND APPEAL NO.82 OF 2019
Ramkrishna Vithal Naik & Anr.
….Appellants
VERSUS
Mandir Madhu Naik & Anr.
….Respondents
Shri A.D. Bhobe and Ms Annelise Fernandes, Advocates for the
Appellants.
Shri I. Agha, Advocate for the Respondents.
Coram:- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
Date:- 2 February 2021
ORAL ORDER :
The appellants filed Regular Civil Suit No.79/2013/C before the
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ponda. They sought a declaration that the
inventory proceedings concluded in 2005 had been vitiated by fraud.
Consequently, they sought an injunction, as well. The suit was filed
against two defendants, who are the respondents here.
2. The respondents are the sons of the first appellant's deceased
brother. Through its judgment, dated 04.05.2018, the trial Court
dismissed the suit. Aggrieved, the appellants filed the first appeal:
Regular Civil Appeal No.71/2018, before the District Court–2, at Ponda.
On 28.12.2018, the First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal, thus,
affirming the trial Court's findings. Further aggrieved, the appellants have
filed this Second Appeal.
3. In the Second Appeal, the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.