SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AMAR SUBHA NAIK AND 9 ORS – Appellant
Versus
DEVU KESHAV NAIK AND 43 ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['ADV MAITHILI SHARAD PRABHU CHODNEKAR', '', 'ADV ARAUJO ASHVINI AFONSO', 'ADV ASHWIN D BHOBE R', '', '', '', '', '', '', 'ADV BHOBE SHRADHA SUBHASH R', '', 'amp', 'ADV BHOBE SHRADHA SUBHASH R', 'amp', 'ADV ASHWIN D BHOBE', 'ADV ASHWIN D BHOBE', 'amp']

vinita -- 1 -- wp600 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO. 600 OF 2018

AMAR SUBHA NAIK AND ORS.,

... Petitioners.

Versus

DEVU KESHAV NAIK AND 43 ORS.

... Respondents.

Shri S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Shri Terence Sequeira,

Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri A. D. Bhobe and Ms. A. Fernandes, Advocates for the respondents.

Coram:- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

Reserved on:- 16th January 2020.

Pronounced on:-15th March, 2021.

ORAL ORDER

Facts:

This Writ Petition has ten petitioners and 44 respondents.

Respondent nos. 1 to 36 were the original plaintiffs; they filed Regular

Civil Suit No.56/2014/A before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ponda,

seeking various reliefs. Of the 18 defendants, defendant nos. 6 and 18

filed one written statement. Besides, they raised a counterclaim; they

wanted a declaration that the plaintiffs are strangers to the Trust. They

have also sought a permanent injunction, besides other incidental

reliefs.

2. Similarly, defendant nos.2, 9 and 13 filed a separate written

statement. In fact, they too have ackno

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top