SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

REUBEN FRANCO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GOA, THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 5 ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['ADV ROHIT BRAS DE SA', '', 'ADV GOVIND SALKAR', 'ADV PRITI S P DESHPRABHU', 'ADV SHIVDATT P MUNJ', '', 'ADV PRACHITA R KALANGUTKAR', 'ADV RAJESH SHIVOLKAR', 'ADV JAMADAR AMIRKUSRO GULAMRASUL', 'ADV PRAVIN N FALDESSAI', '', 'amp', 'ADV PAI NIKHIL DEELIP']

1 wp771-17-24-07-18

Santosh

IN

THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.771 OF 2017

Reuben Franco.

…..... Petitioner.

Versus.

State of Goa through its

Chef Secretary & others.

…...... Respondents.

Mr. Rohit Bras de Sa, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. Pravin Faldessai, Additional Government Advocate for the

Respondents No.1,2, 4 and 5.

Mr. Nikhil Pai, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

Mr. Parikshit Sawant, Advocate for Respondent No.6.

Coram : N.M. Jamdar &

Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.

Date : 24 July 2018.

P.C.:

By this Petition, the Petitioner has made the following

prayers :

“(A) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of

mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any

other appropriate writ, order ore direction, directing that

the development activities being undertaken by Mr.

Michael Lobo, MLA-Calangute Constituency without

following due procedure of law/acquiring the land

violates Article 300(A) of the Constitution of India be

immediately stopp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top