SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI – Appellant
Versus
CANDOLIM URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD – Respondent


Advocates:
['ADV AMIRA ABDUL RAZAQ', 'ADV S R RIVANKAR', '', 'ADV S B RIVANKAR', 'ADV RAMA GAJANAN RIVANKAR']

1 txas20,27,35,38-18,150-17-11-10-18

Santosh

IN

THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

TAX APPEALS NO.20, 27, 35, 38 OF 2018 & 150 OF 2017

The Commissioner of Income Tax.

…... Appellant.

Versus.

Candolim Urban Co-operative

Society Ltd.

…... Respondent.

Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.

Mr. S. R. Rivankar and Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocates for the

Respondent.

Coram : N.M. Jamdar &

Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.

Date : 11 October 2018.

P.C.:

In these Appeals, the tax effect shown by the Appellant-

Revenue is below 50.00 lakhs. In view of the CBDT Circular

dated 11 July 2018, pursuant to the National Litigation Policy the

Income Tax Department has to withdraw the Appeals where the tax

effect is below 50.00 lakhs. The Circular also had given the date of

20 August 2018 to the Commissioner to take a decision.

2.

In view of this policy, the Tax Appeals where placed on

the board on 28 August 2018, and 6 September 2018 to enable the

2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top