907-WPCR90-2019.DOC

Vinita

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA.

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.90 OF 2019

WITH

COTEMPT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2019.

WITH

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 887 OF 2021(F)

IN

COTEMPT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2019.

WITH

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 233 OF 2018

WITH

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 81 OF 2021

IN

CONTEMPT PETTION NO. 17 OF 2019

WITH

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1247 OF 2021(FILING)

SANJAY JAIN.,

…. Petitioner.

VS

ANJU SANJAY JAIN.

…. Respondent.

Mr. J. Supekar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. A. Desai, Advocate for the respondent.

WITH

CONTEMPT PETTION NO. 17 OF 2019

IN

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 90 OF 2019.

WITH

CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2021

IN

CONTEMPT PETTION NO. 17 OF 2019&

CRA NO. 1089 of 2021F

Page 1 of 3

29^th October, 2021

907-WPCR90-2019.DOC

ANJU SANJAY JAIN.

… Petitioner.

Vs

SANJAY JAIN.,

… Respondent.

Ms. A. Desai, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. J.Supekar, Advocate for the respondent.

CORAM:- MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE:- 29^th October, 2021.

P.C.:-

1.

The learned Counsel for the rival parties informed this

Court that a comprehensive settlement was arrived at between

the parties after detailed negotiations. The consent terms were

modified and accordingly an application for filing addendum to

the consent terms dated 3.5.2019 has been handed over to this

Court. It is signed by both the parties and their respective

counsel. Paragraphs 3 of the application gives list of the

matters which the petitioner in Criminal Writ Petition no. 90 of

2019 i.e husband proposes to withdraw as well as list of the

matters respondent wife seeks permission to withdraw. It is

brought to the notice of this Court that steps necessary under

the said modified consent terms have been taken by the parties

and that the husband has handed over demand drafts

pertaining to the amounts agreed between the parties. The

Page 2 of 3

29^th October, 2021

907-WPCR90-2019.DOC

details are given in paragraph 9 of the application.

2.

In this light, the learned counsel appearing for the

applicant submitted that all the pending matters could be

disposed of in terms of the modified consent terms. Parties are

present in Court.

3.

In view of the detailed consent terms of modified

settlement placed on record and the statement made on behalf

of the rival parties that they shall abide by the terms, this Court

is inclined to allow the present application.

4.

Application is allowed. Consequently the matters listed at

paragraphs 3a and 3b of the application are permitted to be

withdrawn and they are disposed of as withdrawn.

5.

Parties are directed to abide by the terms of settlement.

MANISH PITALE, J.

Page 3 of 3

29^th October, 2021

VINITA VIKAS NAIK

Digitally signed by VINITA VIKAS NAIK

Date: 2021.10.29 16:15:52 +05'30'