THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI – Appellant
Versus
DEENDAYAL NAGAR SAHAKARI PATHSAUNSTHA MARYADIT – Respondent
1 txa133-142-17-11-10-18
Santosh
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEALS NO.133 & 142 OF 2017
The Principal Commissioner of
Income Tax.
…... Appellant.
Versus.
Deendayal Nagar Sahakari
Pathsaunstha Maryadit.
…... Respondent.
Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Mr. Somnath Karpe, Advocate for the Respondent.
Coram : N.M. Jamdar &
Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.
Date : 11 October 2018.
P.C.:
In these Appeals, the tax effect shown by the Appellant-
Revenue is below 50.00 lakhs. In view of the CBDT Circular dated
₹
11 July 2018, pursuant to the National Litigation Policy the Income
Tax Department has decided to withdraw the Appeals where the tax
effect is below 50.00 lakhs. The Circular also had given the date of
₹
20 August 2018 to the Commissioner to take a decision.
2.
In view of this policy, the Tax Appeals where placed on
the board on 28 August 2018, and 6 September 2018 to enable the
2 txa133-142-17-11-10-18
Revenu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.