SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI – Appellant
Versus
DEENDAYAL NAGAR SAHAKARI PATHSAUNSTHA MARYADIT – Respondent


Advocates:
['ADV AMIRA ABDUL RAZAQ', 'ADV SOMNATH B KARPE', '', 'ADV ASMITA NAKUL TIRODKAR', 'ADV RAJAN REJITHA']

1 txa133-142-17-11-10-18

Santosh

IN

THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

TAX APPEALS NO.133 & 142 OF 2017

The Principal Commissioner of

Income Tax.

…... Appellant.

Versus.

Deendayal Nagar Sahakari

Pathsaunstha Maryadit.

…... Respondent.

Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.

Mr. Somnath Karpe, Advocate for the Respondent.

Coram : N.M. Jamdar &

Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.

Date : 11 October 2018.

P.C.:

In these Appeals, the tax effect shown by the Appellant-

Revenue is below 50.00 lakhs. In view of the CBDT Circular dated

11 July 2018, pursuant to the National Litigation Policy the Income

Tax Department has decided to withdraw the Appeals where the tax

effect is below 50.00 lakhs. The Circular also had given the date of

20 August 2018 to the Commissioner to take a decision.

2.

In view of this policy, the Tax Appeals where placed on

the board on 28 August 2018, and 6 September 2018 to enable the

2 txa133-142-17-11-10-18

Revenu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top