PURUSHOTTAM PANDURANG BAKRE, REP. BY CONST. ATT., SUNIL ATCHUT GANPULE AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
NILESH MADHAV MANERKAR – Respondent
1
WP-757-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.757 OF 2019
Purshottam Pandurang Bakre & anr.
... Petitioners
V e r s u s
Nilesh Madhav Manerkar
... Respondent
Mr. Shashikant Narayan Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. Ashwin D. Bhobe and Ms. Annelise Fernandes, Advocate for
the Respondent.
Coram :- C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date : 17
th October, 2019.
ORAL ORDER
1.
Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
2.
This petition can be disposed off on a short count. The
petitioner feeling aggrieved by an order dated 03.07.2019
passed by the learned Trial Court, permitting the respondent-
plaintiff to examine himself “through the Power of Attorney
holder” Shri Vishwas Kinjawadekar, has filed this petition on
the ground that the Power of Attorney Holder cannot depose in
the place of the original plaintiff, who was partly examined as
Pw.1.
2
WP-757-19.doc
3.
Mr. Joshi, the learned Counsel for the petitioners pointed
out that the plaintiff had entered into the witness box and his
chief examination was partly recorded after which he
abandoned the further examination and instead sought to
examine the Power of Attorney Holder.
4.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.