SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT GOA
MR.FLOYD COUTINHO,CUNCOLIM,SALCETE-GOA – Appellant
Versus
MRS.BEATRICA DIAS,FATORDA-GOA AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHRI ARUN BRAS DE SA', 'S S KANTAK', 'R', '', 'SHRI SUBODH S KANTAKR']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA.

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2003.

Mr. Floyd Coutinho,

r/o 1G, Grass Villa,

H. No. 100,

Socrecotto, Demani,

Cuncolim.

... Appellant.

Versus

1. Mrs. Beatrica Dias,

Flat No. 3,

Miguelina Apartments,

Murida, Agalli,

Fatorda.

2. State.

... Respondents.

Mr. Arun Bras de Sa, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mr. S.S. Kantak, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.

Mr. S.N. Sardessai, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent

No. 2/State.

Coram : P.V. HARDAS, J.

Date : 23rd March 2004.

ORAL JUDGMENT.

The complainant, being aggrieved, by the

Judgment, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First

Class, Margao, dated 31st May 2003 in Criminal Case No.

188/OA/NI/2002/I, acquitting the respondent no.

1/accused for an offence punishable under Section 138 of

the Negotiable Instruments Act, has filed the present

appeal.

2. The facts, in brief, as are necessary for the

decision of this appe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top