Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT GOA
F.M. REIS, J
Francisco Xavier Rose Almeida, Smt. Mafaldina Almeida – Appellant
Versus
Antonio Columban Wilson das Dores Fernandes alias Wilson Fernandes – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. boundary dispute and possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding possession rights and boundary claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's emphasis on evidence evaluation in appeals. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final decision to remand based on evidence assessment. (Para 9) |
ORAL JUDGMENT :-
Heard Shri S. D. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants and Shri C. A. Coutinho, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. The above appeal came to be admitted by an order dated 20th January, 2009, on the following substantial questions of law :
1. Whether it was necessary for the courts below to have framed a issue/point for determination as to which party was in possession of the disputed portion ?
2. Whether the courts below should have considered the evidence on record to find out which party was in possession and that having not been done, whether the judgment and order passed by the courts below should be said to be perverse ?
3. Shri S.D. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that there is a boundary dispute between the property belonging to the appellants and the respondent as, according to him, the property of the appellants i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
