BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT GOA
MR. NICOLAU ROSARIO GOES – Appellant
Versus
MR. JOAQUIM MANUEL IRES GOMES – Respondent
SA 84/2009
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
SECOND APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2009
Mr. Nicolau Rosario Goes,
Senior Citizen,
Through his duly constituted
Power of Attorney Mr. Joquim Goes,
Son of Mr. Nicolau R. Goes,
Resident of House No.230,
Afonsowaddo,
Cavelossim, Salcete-Goa. ...... Appellant
V e r s u s
Mr. Joaquim Manuel Ires Gomes,
Major of age, Landlord,
Resident of Cavelossim,
Salcete-Goa. ...... Respondent
Mr. G. Shirodkar, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. M.P. Almeida, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM: F. M. REIS, J
DATE: 6TH AUGUST,2010.
ORAL JUDGMENT:
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Appellant and the
Respondent.
2.
The above appeal challenges the Judgment and Decree
2
passed in Regular Civil Suit No.15 of 2009 by the learned District
Judge, South Goa, Margao, whereby the appeal preferred by the
Appellant came to be dismissed.
3.
The suit was filed by the Appellant on the ground
that he had been staying in the landed property known as
“Bigeleahem” or “Danghealem” situated at Afonsowaddo of
Cavelossim village, Salcete Taluka, Margao, for the last more than
45 years and that he is possessing a dwelling house bearing house
no.230 (new) and 13 (old) in the suit property, wherein he was also
carrying on bakery business for many years in the village. It is
further his case that the property where the dwelling house is
situated is surveyed under survey no.160/14 of Cavelossim village
which has been promulgated. It is further his case that he is
illiterate and that he made an application to the Deputy Collector to
delete the wrong entries in the survey records. It is his contention
that the Talathi directed him to move the Court for such correction.
It is further his case that beside residing in the dwelling house
bearing house no.13(old) and 230(new), he has also been
undertaking bakery business of preparing bread and supplying
them in the village with the help of others and his family members.
He further contents that the payment of house tax, trade tax and
3
light tax to the local Panchayat was made by him. It is further his
case that the electricity supply continues to remain in the name of
his son Mr. Joao Rosario Goes and this aspect continues in view of
some family arrangement between the family members. It is
further his case that the respondent being the neighbour and
landlord of the property in the village requested the respondent to
sell of the portion of the suit property covering the house of the
appellant as they were in possession and enjoyment since their
childhood. However, after repeated requests the respondent agreed
not to disturb the use and enjoyment and possession of the
appellant's dwelling house, but did not agree to sell the plot
wherein the appellant had his dwelling house. It is further his case
that the appellant is not paying any rent or any payment to the
respondent. It is further his case that in view of the erroneous
entries in the survey records and for the purpose of correcting the
record of rights and deletion and cancellation of wrong entries as
shown therein, he filed an application dated 31.1.1992 before the
Deputy Collector. As the appellant was asked to move the civil
Court for rectification, the appellant filed the suit praying inter alia
for a mandatory injunction and/or direction and with the prayer to
change, to alter, to cancel and remove the words “rented” in the
4
other rights column in survey no.160/14 of Cavelossim village,
Salcete Taluka and also for a mandatory injunction or direction of
mandatory nature directing the survey authorities including the
Talathi to carry out the orders and direction of the Civil Court.
3.
The Respon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.