SHRI. SUNNY SHASHI KAMAT PANJIKAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SHRI. SHRIRAM G. PARULEKAR AND ANR – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 72 OF 2016
SHRI. SUNNY SHASHI KAMAT PANJIKAR
AND ANR.,
... Appellants
Versus
SHRI. SHRIRAM G. PARULEKAR AND
ANR.,
... Respondents
Mr. Deep D. Shirodkar, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. J. Vaz, Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:- C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:-
15th December, 2016
P.C.
Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and the learned
Counsel for the respondents, for some time.
2. The appellants, who are the defendants before the Trial
Court, are challenging the order dated 02/12/2016, by which, ad
interim ex-parte injunction has been granted in the following
terms :
"Heard Ld. Adv. Shri Bhagi. Perused records. Plaintiff has
prima facie shown that the defendants no.1 & 2 have
undertaken construction in plot no.3 surveyed under no.8/8
of village Veling, which is not in accordance with Law.
Hence, defendants no.1 & 2 are restrained from carrying out
2
AO/72/2016
further construction in the plot no.3 of survey no.8/8 of
village Veling until the next date of hearing. Issue notice
to defendants returnable on next date."
3. The learned Tr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.