SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHRI. SUNNY SHASHI KAMAT PANJIKAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SHRI. SHRIRAM G. PARULEKAR AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 72 OF 2016

SHRI. SUNNY SHASHI KAMAT PANJIKAR

AND ANR.,

... Appellants

Versus

SHRI. SHRIRAM G. PARULEKAR AND

ANR.,

... Respondents

Mr. Deep D. Shirodkar, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. J. Vaz, Advocate for the respondents.

Coram:- C. V. BHADANG, J.

Date:-

15th December, 2016

P.C.

Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and the learned

Counsel for the respondents, for some time.

2. The appellants, who are the defendants before the Trial

Court, are challenging the order dated 02/12/2016, by which, ad

interim ex-parte injunction has been granted in the following

terms :

"Heard Ld. Adv. Shri Bhagi. Perused records. Plaintiff has

prima facie shown that the defendants no.1 & 2 have

undertaken construction in plot no.3 surveyed under no.8/8

of village Veling, which is not in accordance with Law.

Hence, defendants no.1 & 2 are restrained from carrying out

2

AO/72/2016

further construction in the plot no.3 of survey no.8/8 of

village Veling until the next date of hearing. Issue notice

to defendants returnable on next date."

3. The learned Tr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top