ARIHANT SHIP BREAKERS, REP. BY ITS SOLE PROP., NITA JAIN – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF GOA, THR. THE DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF TOURISM – Respondent
1
wp no.1052 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.1052 OF 2019
Arihant Breakers
... Petitioner
Versus
Government of Goa
... Respondent
Shri Akshay Kolse Patil, Shri Raunaq Rao and Shri Khan Nafeez, Advocate
for the Petitioner.
Shri D. Pangam, Advocate General with Shri Deep Shirodkar, Additional
Government Advocate for the Respondent.
Coram: DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
Date: 15th January 2020
ORAL ORDER:
Introduction:
A partnership firm contracts. That contract runs into a dispute. So
it must raise an arbitrable dispute, and it does. But by then, the
partnership firm gets reduced to a proprietary concern. In the arbitration,
the opposite party questions the proprietary concern’s standing. The
Arbitral Tribunal disagrees. Later, the proprietary concern applies to the
District Court under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
for a time extension. The opposite party takes the same objection: that the
party to the agreement and the party to the arbitration are different. Is
that objection sustainable?
Facts:
2. The Government wanted to clear the remains of a shipwreck. For
2
wp no.1052 of 2019
this, it floated tenders and a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.