SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.V.Renewable Energy Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Registrar of Companies – Respondent
WP 1338/2021



Advocates:
['Y Prakash', '', 'R VINOTHKUMAR', 'R SIDHARTH', 'M/S P J ANITHA', 'CGSC', '', 'M/S KINGSLY SOLOMON J', 'K RAJESWARAN']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.03.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

W.P. Nos.1338, 1340, 1341 and 1345 of 2021

and

WMP Nos.1504, 1505, 1506 and 1510 of 2021

V.V. Renewable Energy Private Limited

Represented by its Director,

J.Centhilrajan

Petitioner in W.P. No.1338 of 2021

V.V. Titanium Pigments Private Limited

Represented by its Director,

J.Centhilrajan

Petitioner in W.P. No.1340 of 2021

Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Private Limited

Represented by its Director,

J.Centhilrajan

Petitioner in W.P. No.1341 of 2021

Ajax Media Tech Private Limited

Represented by its Director,

J.Centhilrajan

Petitioner in W.P. No.1345 of 2021

Vs

1. The Registrar of Companies,

Shastri Bhavan

II Floor,

26, Haddows Road,

Chennai - 600 006.

2. S.Vaikundarajan

...

Respondents in W.P. Nos.1338,

1340 and 1341 of 2021

2. V. Subramanian

...

Respondent in W.P. No.1345 of 2021

Common Prayer :

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling

for the records relating to the proceedings in F.No.Roc-

Chn/IPC/88883/2020 (J006072020), F.No.Roc-Chn/IPC/82322/2020

(J00052454),

F.No.Roc-Chn/IPC/64381/2020

(J00052446)

and

F.No.Roc-Chn/IPC/98211/2020 (J00052461) respectively issued

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

vide notices dated 16.07.2020, 17.07.2020 and 17.12.2020 on the

file of the Registrar of Companies, the respondent No.1 herein

and quash the same.

For petitioner in all W.P.s ...

Mr.Vijay Narayan

Senior Counsel for

Mr.Y.Prakash

For R1 in all W.P.S

...

Ms.P.J. Anitha,

Central Govt. Standing counsel

For R2

in W.P. No.1338 of 2021

.... Mr.V.Lakshmi Narayanan

for M/s.Kingsly Solomon

in W.P. No.1340 of 2021

.... Mr.Karthik Seshadri for

M/s.K.Aravintha Bharathi

in W.P. No.1341 of 2021

.... Mr.S. Elambharathi

in W.P. No.1345 of 2021

.... Mr.M.K.Kabir,

Senior Counsel

for M/s.J.Johnsy Greeta

COMMON ORDER

These writ petitions have been filed challenging the summons

issued by the 1st respondent (Registrar of Companies) to the

respective petitioners under Section 206 of the Companies Act,

2013, directing the respective petitioners to appear on a

specified date and submit all the registers/documents before

the 1st respondent pertaining to the vacation/removal of the

respective second respondent and his family members as directors

in the group companies under section 167 and 169 of the

Companies Act, 2013 respectively.

2. The summons under Section 206 of the Companies Act have

been issued by the 1st respondent based on a complaint given by

the respective 2nd respondent in all these writ petitions.

S.Vaikundarajan and S. Jegatheesan are brothers and there are

certain family disputes between themselves. They are Directors

of various Companies. The 2nd respondent Vaikundarajan in W.P.

Nos.1338, 1340 and 1341 of 2021 and the 2nd respondent

V. Subramanian in W.P.No.1345 of 2021 have given separate

complaints under Section 206 of the Companies Act with the 1st

respondent on 06.07.2020 against S. Jegatheesan and other

members of his family, who are holding shares in various

Companies along with the respective 2nd respondent on the ground

that the Resolutions passed by S. Jegatheesan and his family

members in June and July 2020, removing the respective 2nd

respondent and his family members as Directors of various

Companies viz., M/s.V.V. Renewable Energy Private Limited;

M/s.V.V. Titanium Pigments Private Limited; M/s.Dhanalakshmi

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Srinivasan Sugars Private Limited and M/s.Ajax Media Tech

Private Limited have been fraudulently passed without the

concurrence of the respective 2nd respondent and his family

members, who are also having shares in the said Companies.

Acting on the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top