HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KAAYCEEYEN ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP 1052/2011
['M/S K RAJA', '', 'N KOLANDAIVELU', 'M/S O R SANTHANAKRISHNAN', '', 'M/S ANAND', 'ABDUL & VINOTH ASSOCIATES', 'R- DISD VIDE COURT ORDER DT', 'R - THE UNION OF INDIA', 'REP BY ITS SECRETARY', 'MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS', 'SASTHRI BHAVAN', 'NEW DELHI', 'R- THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU', 'FOOD', 'CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION DEPARTMENT', 'FORT ST GEORGE', 'CHENNAI', 'R- THE COMMISSIONER', 'CHEPAUK', 'CHENNAI']
W.P.Nos.1052 & 1053 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.07.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.Nos.1052 & 1053 of 2011
and
M.P.Nos.1,1,2 & 2 of 2011
Kaayceeyen Enterprises
Rep. by its Partner Mr.K.Natarajan
Carrying on business
at No.72, Illuppur Road,
Kallukudi,
Trichy- 600 020.
.. Petitioner in W.P.No.1052 of 2011
Karumari Amman Kerosene Depot
Rep.by its Proprietor Mr.V.Jayakumar,
Carrying on business
at No.42, Padmanabha Nagar Main Road,
Padmanabha Nagar,
Choolaiedu,
Chennai - 600 094.
.. Petitioner in W.P.No.1053 of 2011
Vs.
1. The Union of India,
Rep. by its Secretary,
Ministry of Petroleum
and Natural gas
Sasthri Bhavan,
New Delhi.
1/5
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.Nos.1052 & 1053 of 2011
2. The Director (Marketing)
Indian Oil Corporation,
G-9, Ali Yuavar Jung Marg,
Bandara East, Mumbai - 400 051.
3. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.,
Rep by its Chairman & Managing Director,
17, Jamshed Ji Tatta Road,
Mumbai - 400 020.
4. Indian Oil Corporation Limited,
rep by its Chairman & Managing Director,
Scope Complex, New Delhi - 110 003.
5. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.,
rep by its Chairman & Managing Director,
Bharat bavan, No.4 & 6, currim bhoy road,
Ballard estate, P.B.No.688,
Mumbai - 1.
6. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
rep by its Secretary, Food, Civil,
Supplies & Consumer
Protection Department,
Fort. St. George,
Chennai - 600 009.
7. The Commissioner for
Civil Supplies, Chepauk,
Chennai - 600 005.
.. Respondents in both WPs.
Prayer in W.P.No.1052 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of
Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus calling for the impugned advertisement published in the Hindu
Newspaper dated 15.06.2010 by the 2nd to 5th respondents for
2/5
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.Nos.1052 & 1053 of 2011
appointment of LPG distributors in Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District and
quash the same and consequently direct the 1st to 5th respondents herein to
allot LPG distributorship in Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District or in any
location in Tamil Nadu to the petitioner.
Prayer in W.P.No.1053 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of
Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus calling for the impugned advertisement published in the Hindu
Newspaper dated 15.06.2010 by the 2nd to 5th respondents for appointment
of LPG distributors in Vyasarpadi, Chennai District and quash the same and
consequently direct the 1st to 5th respondents herein to allot LPG
distributorship in Vyasarpadi, Chennai District or in any location in Tamil
Nadu to the petitioner.
For petitioners in both WPs. : Mr.K.Raja
For Respondent No.2 : Mr.A.A.V.Partners
For Respondent Nos.3 & 5 : Mr.O.R.Karthikeyan
For Respondent No.4
: Died
For Respondent Nos.6 & 7 : Mr.Krishnaraja
Government Advocate
COMMON ORDER
The petitioners have come forward with these writ petitions for
issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the advertisement
published in the Hindu Newspaper dated 15.06.2010 by the 2nd to 5th
respondents, quash the same and for consequential direction.
3/5
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.Nos.1052 & 1053 of 2011
2.Today, when the writ petitions were taken up for consideration, the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioners fairly submitted that the issue
involved herein is no longer res integra. Earlier, this Court by order dated
30.6.2016 in W.P.Nos.35322 to 35326 of 2013, 9056 & 9057 of
2014,3121 & 29110 of 2015 and W.P.(MD) Nos.17218 to 17223 of 2013
in the case of (Sri Ram Agencies, HPCL Dealer, represented by its
Proprietor S.Gajendran Vs. Union of India, represented by its Secretary,
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas and others ) has dismissed those
writ petitions which was af