MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.HARISH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
K.RAMASAMY – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON
: 24.11.2021
PRONOUNCED ON : 25.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
A.S.No.785 of 2009
P.Harish Kumar
... Appellant/4th Defendant
Vs.
1.K.Ramasamy
... 1st Respondent/Plaintiff
2.K.Palanisamy
3.Janarthanam
4.N.Natesan
... Respondents 2 to 4/Defendants 1 to 3
Prayer:- This Appeal Suit has been filed, under Order 41 Rule 1
read with Section 96 of CPC, against the judgement and decree,
dated 18.09.2008, made in OS.No.56 of 2007 by the I Additional
District Judge at Erode.
For Appellant
:
Mr.V.Ayyadurai
Senior Advocate
For Respondents
:
Mr.N.Manokaran-R1
RR2 to 4 – Given Up
JUDGMENT
1.This Appeal Suit has been filed, against the judgment and
decree, dated 18.09.2008, made in OS.No.56 of 2007 by the I
Additional District Judge at Erode.
2.The suit was filed, seeking a judgment and decree, directing
the Defendants to pay a sum of Rs.16,91,097/- with interest, by
creating a charge over the suit property and for costs.
3.The case of the Plaintiff, as set out, in the plaint is that
the Defendants 1 to 3 had executed a Power of Attorney in
favour of the 4th Defendant in respect of the suit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.