SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.HARISH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
K.RAMASAMY – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S V AYYADURAI', 'M/S N MANOKARAN', '', 'D GOPAL', 'P SAMUEL GUNASINGH', 'M/S P M JAYACHANDRAN', 'RR TO - GIVEN UP - VIDE IN EB']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

RESERVED ON

: 24.11.2021

PRONOUNCED ON : 25.03.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

A.S.No.785 of 2009

P.Harish Kumar

... Appellant/4th Defendant

Vs.

1.K.Ramasamy

... 1st Respondent/Plaintiff

2.K.Palanisamy

3.Janarthanam

4.N.Natesan

... Respondents 2 to 4/Defendants 1 to 3

Prayer:- This Appeal Suit has been filed, under Order 41 Rule 1

read with Section 96 of CPC, against the judgement and decree,

dated 18.09.2008, made in OS.No.56 of 2007 by the I Additional

District Judge at Erode.

For Appellant

:

Mr.V.Ayyadurai

Senior Advocate

For Respondents

:

Mr.N.Manokaran-R1

RR2 to 4 – Given Up

JUDGMENT

1.This Appeal Suit has been filed, against the judgment and

decree, dated 18.09.2008, made in OS.No.56 of 2007 by the I

Additional District Judge at Erode.

2.The suit was filed, seeking a judgment and decree, directing

the Defendants to pay a sum of Rs.16,91,097/- with interest, by

creating a charge over the suit property and for costs.

3.The case of the Plaintiff, as set out, in the plaint is that

the Defendants 1 to 3 had executed a Power of Attorney in

favour of the 4th Defendant in respect of the suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top