SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.MOHAMED AYUB ALI – Appellant
Versus
M.LOGANATHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S KAITHAMALAI KUMARAN', 'M/S A SUNDARAVADHANAM', '', 'FOR RESPONDENTS', 'VIDE COURT ORDER DT', 'VAKALAT NOT FILED', '', 'S THANGAVEL', 'R ARULDHAS', 'VIDE COURT ORDER DT']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

RESERVED ON : 15.03.2021

PRONOUNCED ON : 05.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

S.A.No.936 of 1999

1.K.Mohamed Ayub Ali

2.Shesira Bibi

3.Thakria Bibi

4.K.M.Kamaruzaman (died)

...Appellants/Plaintiffs

Vs.

1.M.Loganathan

2.S.Bhuvaneswari

3.Kairunissa Bibi(died)

4.Faride Bibi

...Respondents/Defendants 1 to 4

Prayer: Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the

Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the

learned Second Additional District Judge, Erode, in A.S.No.228

of 1997, dated 19.08.1998 preferred against the judgment and

decree of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode, in

O.S.No.752/1992, dated 15.11.1996.

For Appellants : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy

Senior Counsel

for Mr.Kaithamalai Kumaran

For Respondents: Mr.A.Sundaravadhanam

JUDGMENT

(The case has been heard through Video Conference)

The defeated plaintiffs are the appellants herein.

2.During the pendency of the Second Appeal, fourth appellant

died and the plaintiffs 1 to 3 were recognized as the legal

representatives, they were already on record. The thi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top