HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.ROOPAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY – Respondent
CRL OP 2271/2022
['M/S T E EKAMBARAM', '', 'N SIVSBHARATHI', 'B SARAVANAN', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.2271 of 2022
D.Roopavathi
... Petitioner
Vs.
The state of Tamilnadu rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
Uthukottai police Station,
Uthukottai,
Thiruvallur District.
... Respondent
PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482
of Cr.P.C., praying, to direct the respondent to reinvestigate
the case and register the complaint in accordance with the
complaint dated 21.12.2021 preferred by the petitioner with
regard to offences of cheating, abatement of suicide and
misappropriation of sale consideration of Rs.11,05,500/- under
Section 305, 403 and 420 of IPC.
For Petitioner
: Mr.T.E.Ekambaram
For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
Additional Public Prosecutor.
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct
the respondent to reinvestigate the case and register the
complaint in accordance with the complaint dated 21.12.2021
preferred by the petitioner with regard to offences of cheating,
abatement of suicide and misappropriation of sale consideration
of Rs.11,05,500/- under Sections 305, 403 and 420 of IPC.
2.
Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor for the respondent would submit that based on the
complaint given by the petitioner, enquiry has been conducted
and the same is pending on the file of the respondent police.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
4. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW
Crl 489 and the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment
rendered by a three Judge Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki,
reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying upon Sakiri Vasu's
Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot issue
any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intervene
only in extraordinary circumstances and rare cases. However,
taking note of the fact that the complaint is now pending and
not been enquired, the Investigation officer is directed to
issue notice to the parties and conduct enquiry as directed by
the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs.
Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)]. If
any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is
bound to register the FIR otherwise they may close the
complaint. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of
two weeks from today.
5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original
Petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nr/shk
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
Uthukottai police Station,
Uthukottai,
Thiruvallur District.
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras.
+1cc to Mr.T.E.Ekambaram, Advocate, S.R.No.34975
Crl.O.P.No.2271 of 2022
SKM(CO)
SB(27/06/2022)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/