SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANGAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE – Respondent
HCP 1686/2015



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 29.07.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN

AND

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM

H.C.P. No.1686 of 2015

Angammal

... Petitioner/Relative of the detenue

-v-

1.The Superintendent of Police,

Villupuram District,

Villupuram.

2.The Inspector of Police,

Tirurunavalur Police Satation,

Villupuram District.

3.The Superintendent of Police,

Cuddalore District.

... Respondents

Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India praying for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus directing

the respondents to produce the detenus 1)Sekar, son of Rengan, aged

about 35 years, 2)Elumalai, son of Koothan, aged about 45 years, and

3) Muniyan, son of Rengan, now illegally detained by the second

respondent and produce the detenus before this Court and to set them

at liberty forthwith.

For Petitioner

:

Mr.R.Sankarasubbu

For Respondents

:

Mr.A.N.Thambidurai

Addl. Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by S.TAMILVANAN,J.)

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.

2.This petition has been filed by the petitioner/relative of the

detenus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking an

order in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to

produce the detenus 1)Sekar, son of Rengan, aged about 35 years, 2)

Elumalai, son of Koothan, aged about 45 years, and 3) Muniyan, son of

Rengan, now illegally detained by the second respondent and produce

the detenus before this Court and to set them at liberty forthwith.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.According to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, as per

the Status Report filed by him, there is no illegal detention.

4.In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public

Prosecutor, we are of the view that the petition is liable to be

dismissed. In the result, the petition is dismissed as not

maintainable.

5.It is made clear that the petitioner is entitled to approach

the appropriate forum for seeking appropriate relief.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

True Copy

Sub Assistant Registrar

kal

To

1.The Superintendent of Police,

Villupuram District,

Villupuram.

2.The Inspector of Police,

Tirurunavalur Police Satation,

Villupuram District.

3.The Superintendent of Police,

Cuddalore District.

4.The Public Prosecutor,

High Court of Madras,

Chennai 600 104.

H.C.P. No.1686 of 2015

sr(co)

pmk.13.08.2015

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top