Advocates:
['M/S R GURURAJ', '', 'D BASKAR', 'MANJULA BASKAR', 'M/S R SUBRAMANIAN', '', 'P RAJENDRAN', 'RR TO AND NDW', 'R JAYARAM NAIDU', 'R HEMAMPUJAM', 'R MINOR MURALI', 'R MINOR SAMPATH']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Reserved On:25.01.2017

Pronounced On:13.02.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN

SECOND APPEAL No.1251 of 1996

Jayaram Naidu

.. Appellant

/versus/

1.Vasanthi Kumari

2.Arumugam

3.Ramalingam

4.Anjalai Ammal

5.Jayaram Naidu

6.Sarangapani Naidu

7.Hemampujam

8.Latha

9.Ravi

10.Minor Murali

11.Minor Sampath

(Minor respondents 10 and 11

represented by guardian mother

the 7^th respondent Hemampujam)

12.Lakshmi

..Respondents

Prayer:

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure

Code against the judgment and decree dated 11.10.1995 in A.S.No.5 of

2

1993, on the file of the District Judge, South Arcot affirming the judgment

and decree dated 16.09.1992 in O.S.No.338 of 1989 on the file of the

District Munsif, Cuddalore.

For Appellant

:Mr.R.Gururaj

For Respondents :Mrs.A.Nilaphar for

Mr.R.Subramanian for R1

R2,3,4,6,8,9 and 12-NDW

R7,10,11- No appearance

-------

J U D G M E N T

The appellant herein is the first defendant in the suit, who lost

before both the Courts below. The suit was laid for declaration of title,

recovery of possession and mesne profits on the premise that, the

plaintiff's mother and