SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.SOMASUNDARAM AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
P.PAVAYEE AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S M NARAYANASWAMY', '', 'P J RISHIKESH', 'D PRAVEEN', 'M/S N DAMODARAN', '', 'K M SUBRAMANIAN', 'FOR R']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS

DATED: 14.3.2012

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA

A.S.No.921 of 1997

and Tr.A.S.406 of 2008

1.Somasundaram

.... Appellant in

A.S.No.921 of 1997

permitted the first appellant

to continue the proceedings

in A.S.No.921 of 1997 as

sole appellant, assignee of

the rights under the agreement dated 24.2.89

vide order dt.4.1.08 made in C.M.P.No.3178/07

1.K.Somasundaram

2.P.Rajagopal

... Appellants in

A.S.No.406 of 2008

vs.

1.P.Pavayee

2.R.P.Saradha

... Respondents in both

the appeals

Appeals against the common judgement and decrees dated

11.7.1997 passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode, in

O.S.Nos.311 of 1993 and 573 of 1996.

For appellants

:: Mr.T.V.Ramanujam,Sr.counsel for

M/s.M.Narayanaswamy

For Respondents :: Mr.R.Asokan for

M/s.N.Damodaran

COMMON JUDGMENT

These appeals are focussed by the plaintiffs in the suits,

as against the common judgement and decrees dated 11.7.1997 passed

by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode, in O.S.Nos.311 of 1993

and 573 of 1996, which were for specific performance of an agreement

to sell and for obtaining permanent injunction.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top