SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
M/S. HELIOS AND MATHESON – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S NITHYAESH AND VAIBHAV', '', 'NITHYAESH NATRAJ', 'VAIBHAV R VENKATESH', 'CHENNAI']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

RESERVED ON: 24.8.2015 AND PRONOUNCED ON: 28.8.2015

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN

W.A.No.1227 of 2015

M/s Helios and Matheson

Information Technology Ltd.,

rep. by its Authorized Signatory

Mr.D.Sathasivam.

...Appellant

Versus

The State rep. by the Deputy

Superintendent of Police,

DOW-II, Anna Nagar,

Chennai - 600 040.

...Respondent

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against

the order of this court dated 6.8.2015 in W.P.No.14664 of 2015.

W.P.No.14664 of 2015 has been filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of declaration declaring

that the FIR in Crime No.5 of 2015 registered on 1.4.2015 on the

file of the respondent police as without jurisdiction and therefore

ultra vires and non est in law.

For Appellant

:

Mr.P.S.Raman Sr.Counsel for

Mr.Vaibhav R.Venkatesh.

JUDGMENT

V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J

This writ appeal arises out of an order passed by the learned

single Judge dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant,

praying for a declaration that a First Information Report registered

h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top