HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY – Respondent
CRL A 57/2019
['M/S K SUKUMARAN', '', 'S HEMAMALINI', 'E LATHA', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
BAIL SLIP
The Petitioner/Accused Kumar, aged 47 Years S/o.Rajagopal
was directed to be released on bail as per order of this court
dated 25.01.2019 in Crl.M.P.No.1118/2019 in Crl.A.No.57/2019 on
the file of this court.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
Crl.A.No.57 of 2019
Kumar
...Appellant/accused
Vs.
State by Inspector of Police,
Edaiyur Police Station,
(Cr.No.132 of 2008)
...Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, against the judgment of conviction and
sentence imposed upon the appellant by the learned District and
Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur, in
S.C.No.108 of 2010
dated
21.12.2018.
For Appellant
: Mr.K.Sukumaran
For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam,
Government Advocate(crl.side)
J U D G M E N T
The present appeal has been filed by the appellant / accused
against the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed upon him
by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur, in
S.C.No.108 of 2010 dated 21.12.2018.
2.The appellant herein is the sole accused in the above
referred case. He stood charged for the offence punishable under
Sections 452, 294(b), 326 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 3(1) of
Tamilnadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992.
After a full fledged trial, the learned District and Sessions
Judge found the accused guilty under Sections 452, 294(b), 326
of IPC and Section 3(1) of Tamilnadu Property (Prevention of
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Damage and Loss) Act, 1992, convicted and sentenced as follows:
Offence
Sentence
Under Section
452 of IPC
to undergo six months simple imprisonment and to
pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default, to undergo
one month simple imprisonment
Under Section
294(b) of IPC
to pay a fine of Rs.300/- in default, to undergo
one week simple imprisonment
Under Section
326 of IPC
to undergo one year simple imprisonment and to
pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default, to undergo
two months simple imprisonment
Section 3(1)
of Tamilnadu
Property
(Prevention
of Damage and
Loss) Act
to undergo eighteen months simple imprisonment
and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default, to
undergo three months simple imprisonment
The trial court also ordered the sentences to run concurrently
3.Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the accused
is before this Court by way of filing the present criminal
appeal.
4. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:-
(i)P.W.2-Sumathi is the daughter in law of P.W.1-Surendran.
The domestic servant working in the house of P.W.1 is P.W.3. On
08.08.2008 around 1.30 a.m., when at the time P.W.1 was in his
residence along with P.W.2 and P.W.3, the accused-Kumar came
there along with wooden log and abused the P.W.2 by using filthy
language. When the same was questioned by P.W.1, the accused
after pushing her down, stamped on her neck. Further, he
criminally intimidated P.W.1 and later, he damaged the T.V.,
torch light and one car bearing registration No.TN 01 AB 7758
and caused damage to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/-. Later, around
3.00 p.m., P.W.1 brought the P.W.2 to the Best Hospital and
admitted her as an in-patient.
(ii) P.W.8-Dr.Ravi attached to the said hospital, on
08.08.2008 around 7.50 p.m. examined the P.W.2 and found the
following injuries:
(1) contusion over right shoulder size 3x4 cm
(2) contusion over right upper back 4x4 cm
He issued wound certificate under Ex.P6 as injury No.1 is
grievous and the other injury sustained by P.W.2 is simple in
nature.
(iii)In the meanwhile, P.W.10-Natarajan, the then Inspector
of Police, on the same day around 15.30 hrs, received the
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
complaint from P.W.1 and registered a case in crime No.132 of
2008 under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 448