HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MAGESH @ MAGESH BABU AKULA – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP. BY – Respondent
CRL OP 8536/2017
['M/S M KRISHNAMURTHI', '', 'J B SOLOMON PETER KAMALDOSS', 'JOINT COMPORMISE MEMO FILED', '', 'JOINT COMPORMISE AFFIDAVIT', 'M/S L SATHYA KUMAR', 'DEFACTO COMPLAINANT']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.04.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
Crl.O.P.No.8536 of 2017
1.Magesh @ Magesh Babu Akula
2.Veera
3.Praveen @ Praveen Kumar
4.Shock @ Rajan
5.Veeramanikandan
6.Gopi
7.Vinoth Kumar
.. Petitioners/Accused
Vs
1. State rep. by
the Inspector of Police,
H-8, Thiruvottiyur Police Station,
Thiruvottiyur,
Chennai – 600 019.
2. Selvaraj @ Saravanan
.. Respondents/R2-Defacto
Complainant
Petitions filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure
Code, to call for the records in Crime No.1210 of 2015 on the
file of the respondent police pending before the Hon'ble
Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvotriyur, Chennai and to quash the
proceedings.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.Krishnamurthi
For R1
: Mr.C.Emalias, APP
For R2
: Present in person
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for
the records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.1210 of 2015 on
the file of the first respondent police and quash the same.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The facts of the case as averred in the petition are that
both the petitioners / accused and the second respondent /
defacto complainant are the students of two different Colleges
and they belong to same area of North Chennai. Due to difference
of opinion arose between them, on 08.09.2015 at about 7.30am,
they attacked each other with knife, in which, the second
respondent sustained injury. Pursuant to the same, a complaint
was preferred to the first respondent police and the same was
registered against the petitioners as FIR in Crime No.1210 of
2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b),
324, 307 and 506(ii) IPC, which were subsequently altered into
one under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 324, 307 and 506(ii)
r/w 109 IPC. Pending investigation of the same, due to the
efforts taken by the elders and the friends of both the parties,
a compromise was entered into between the parties. Based on the
same, the petitioners have come up with the present petition to
quash the same.
3. Today, all the petitioners along with their learned
counsel on record and the second respondent / defacto
complainant are present. Their identities have been verified.
They have submitted that the dispute between them has been
amicably settled. They have also filed a Joint compromise
affidavit signed by them, dated 27.04.2017 to that effect. When
this Court enquired the parties, particularly, the second
respondent / defacto complainant, about the factum of compromise
and the terms of the compromise, they admitted the same. The
second respondent has also expressed no objection in quashing
the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners
herein.
4. This Court is of the opinion that since the petitioners
and the second respondent are the college students, their
involvement in such criminal activities, cannot be countenanced.
They are expected to concentrate their attention on studies and
complete their respective courses successfully. However, in view
of the compromise entered into between the parties as stated
above, the criminal proceedings in Crime No.1210 of 2015 on the
file of the first respondent police, is quashed, insofar as the
petitioners herein are concerned, on condition that each of the
petitioners shall file individual affidavits countersigned by
their parents, addressed to the College authorities with a copy
marked to the police authorities, to the effect that they will
not indulge in any such illegal activities in future. Failing
compliance of the above condition, the FIR in Crime No.1210 of
2015 shall stand restored against them. Such affidavits have to
be submitted within a period of two weeks from the date of
receipt of a copy of this order.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5. This Criminal O