SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
A.RANI – Appellant
Versus
The Administrative officer – Respondent


Advocates:
['V SIVAKUMAR', '', 'D Muthu', 'GEETHA THAMARAISELVAM SPL GP']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 23.06.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

W.P.No.3451 of 2020

and

W.M.P.No.4026 of 2020

1. A.Rani

2. J.Chandran

3. B.Sivakumar

4. P.M.Bella

5. P.Mani

6. D.Magaraj

7. A.Sumithra

8. B.sivanandam

9. B.Jayaprakash

10. P.N.Chandran

11. S.Raju

12. B.Sivan

13. S.Joghe

14. B.Raju

..Petitioners

-Vs-

1. The Administrative Officer/

Agriculture Officer,

R.S.Puram Uzhavar Sandhai,

R.S.Puram,

Coinbatore.

2. The Deputy Director,

Agriculture Department,

Marketing Committee Compound,

Ramanathapuram,

Coimbatore.

3. The District Collector,

Coimbatore District,

Coimbatore.

..Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified

Mandamus to call for the entire records connected with the

impugned Circular Order passed by the 1st respondent dated

03.02.2020 and quash the same and allow the petitioners to sell

hills vegetables at the Uzhavar Santhai, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore.

For Petitioner

:

Mr.S.Mukund

for V.Sivakumar

For Respondent

:

Mr.T.Seenivasan,

Special Gov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top