Advocates:
['M/S R SATHISH KUMAR', '', 'H RAJESHWARI', 'M/S APR ASSOCIATES']

1

A.No.3670 of 2016

in C.S. No.781 of 2010

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

This application is filed by the applicant/defendant to file

additional documents set out in the Judges Summons filed along

with the application in the above suit.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant/defendant as

well as the learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff.

3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel

appearing for the applicant/defendant and also going through the

averments made in the affidavit, I am inclined to allow the

application. However, the documents sought to be marked as

additional evidence can be marked subject to proof, relevancy and

admissibility at the time of evidence. This Court may follow the

procedures as per the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court

reported in 2001-3-SCC-1 (Bipin Shantilall Panchal Vs. State

of Gujarat and another) while dealing with the question of

admissibility of documents during the course of trial at the stage of

taking evidence when any objection is raised.

2

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

vga

4.Therefore, the applicant/defendant is permitted to file the

documents, subject to pr