SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
SARASWATHY – Appellant
Versus
BABU – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S R MUNIYAPPARAJ', '', 'JERALD C DENNYSON', 'M/S P RATHNAVEL', '', 'C MARIAPPAN']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.01.2013

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU

Contempt Petition No.1807 of 2011

Saraswathy

.. Petitioner

Vs.

Babu

.. Respondent

This contempt petition is preferred under Section 11 of

the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for

wantonly and repeatedly disobeying the order of this court

passed in contempt petition No.958 of 2011 in Crl.M.P.No.1 of

2011 in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2010 in Crl.R.C.No.1321 of 2010 dated

21.7.2011.

For Petitioner

: Mr.R.Maniyapparaj

For Respondent

: Mr.P.Rathinavel

- - - -

ORDER

This contempt petition arose for the alleged

disobedience of the order passed by this court in Contempt

Petition No.958 of 2011 in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2011 in Crl.M.P.No.1

of 2010 in Crl.R.C.No.1321 of 2010, dated 21.7.2011.

2.When the contempt petition came up on 25.11.2011, this

court directed notice to the respondent. Subsequently, the

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2

respondent entered appearance and has filed a counter affidavit,

dated 23.11.2012. The petitioner is married to the respondent

and there has been a running battle between the petitioner and

t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top